本研究以Barry Buzan新安全研究架構探討,台灣大學生對當前台灣國家安全在軍事、政治、經濟、社會與環境五個面向的安全知覺,並檢視大學生在各個安全面向間的知覺,是否具有差異存在。 為了獲得研究結果,本研究透過「文獻分析法」、「調查研究法」、「論述分析」三種研究方法,分析結構與安全行為主體和聽眾之間的關連性,並且透過文本中的安全表述來闡釋當代威脅認知。在「言語−行動」概念下,揭示大學生對政治菁英安全言語論述之反饋。 本研究獲得的實證結果有二:第一,大學生對傳統安全以外的社會和環境安全議題有高度知覺,且認同非傳統安全議題與國家安全的穩定有關連性。第二,大學生在政治安全的知覺分歧性最小,社會安全的知覺分歧最大,顯示大學生認為影響台灣國家安全的最大因素,來自於內部的社會因素。 雖然本研究使用量化的分析方法,對於安全知覺的差異原因無法深入探討,但仍期望經由本研究的討論,提供政府一個國家安全政策的思考方向,不再僅以中國的軍事與政治威脅當作唯一的指涉對象。畢竟,若國家內部動盪不安,更遑論如何面對外在的威脅。
This study is based on Barry Buzan’s new framework for security to analyze university students in Taiwan on current national security in military, political, economic, societal and environmental sector’s perception. And view the differences perception between each security sector. In order to get the answer, this study adapt three research methods include “literature analysis”, “survey analysis”, and “discourse approach”, and through the security utterance of context to interpretive contemporary threat ideal. By the way of “speech act”, it will reveal the feedback by university students to security discourse from the elite. There are tow results for this study. First, Students on social and environmental issues are highly perceived and recognized that non-traditional security issues have related to national security stabile. Second, the smallest difference perception is in political sector, but largest in societal sector. This study expected to provide a direction to think of national security policy and no longer regard China as the only referent object.