本研究主要目的係探討教育部之「教師專業發展評鑑」政策在南投縣辦理的過程。根據研究的結果提出建議,作為日後南投縣推動「教師專業發展評鑑」的參考。 研究方法以文獻分析法及深入訪談為主,訪談對象為南投縣已參與「教師專業發展評鑑」計畫之校長、承辦主任、和非行政職的教師共14位。依所設計之訪談大綱進行訪談,再將蒐集的資料加以整理、分析,所獲得的結論為: 南投縣的教師具有較高的教學熱忱和使命感。參與「教師專業發展評鑑」的教師們對教師評鑑都抱持正面的看法,認為「教師專業發展評鑑」可以帶給自己專業成長,有助於提升教學的品質。「教師專業發展評鑑」計畫規劃了初階、進階、輔導教師等三個階段,符合教師生涯理論,提供教師專業成長途徑,有利於教師專業的發展。 重視「教師專業發展評鑑」的宣導說明會,可讓老師們了解「教師專業發展評鑑」的目的與精神,將有助於更多教師投入「教師專業發展評鑑」。形成性評鑑能幫助教師專業成長,精進教師的專業力,有助於達到提升教學品質和教學效能的教育目標。 依據研究結果並參考美、英和中國大陸的作法提供一般性建議,以及行政主管機關在政策推動上的參考。
The main purpose of this study is to explore the policy of the Ministry of Education’s “Teacher Evaluation for Profession Development” Project in Nan-Tou County. Suggestions based on the result of the study for Teacher Evaluation for Profession Development are offered for the implementation of this project in Nan-Tou County for the future. Documentary analysis and in-depth interviews were conducted in this study. Fourteen interviewees included principals, directors and non-administration teachers who had participated in the Teacher Evaluation Project. Data collected from the interviews were analyzed and summarized into the final conclusions. Teachers in Nan-Tou are enthusiastic and with high commitment of teaching. Teachers who participated in this project are positive with this evaluateon and believe this project can help them improve their teaching quality. The 3-stage Teacher Evaluation for Profession Development Project not only realizes what teacher career theory argues but also provides teachers means for professional development. Teachers could understand the purpose and mission of Teacher Evaluation for Profession Development Project from conferences and public hearings. More and more teachers are willingly to engage themselves in this project. Formation Evaluation is helpful for teachers’ professional development which is good for better teaching quality and reaching educational goal. Suggestions based on the results of this study and the implementations in US, Britain, and China are offered for authorities to consider in carrying out the “Teacher Evaluation for Profession Development policy.”