透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.88.249
  • 學位論文

優勢觀點團體工作運用於 暴力循環中婦女復元之研究

A Study on Exercising Group Work from the Strength Perspective on Women Recovering from the Cycle of Violence

指導教授 : 宋麗玉

摘要


月娥2008 年1 月25 日於台中家中 論文名稱:優勢觀點團體工作運用於暴力循環中婦女復元之研究 校院系:國立暨南國際大學人文學院 社會政策與社會工作學系 頁數:232 畢業年月:民國九十七年一月 學位別:碩士 研究生:曾月娥 指導教授:宋麗玉 博士 論文摘要 本研究為優勢觀點團體工作運用於暴力循環中婦女復元之研究,研究主要目的: 一、 瞭解受暴婦女參與「優勢觀點團體工作」結束後在憂鬱、壓力因應、增強 自我權能、生活滿意度等面向有何改變? 二、 優勢觀點團體工作促進受暴婦女的復元的因素為何? 本研究採量化與質化研究,針對彰化縣家庭暴力防治中心轉介至彰化縣 生命線協會作後續處遇之個案,經由社工員推薦有重複受暴且仍處於暴力 環境中的受暴婦女(含婚姻/離婚/分居)為研究對象,共有六位婦女參與 本研究。 本研究結論: 一、量化研究結果:憂鬱程度有下降的趨勢;情緒因應變化不大;行為因應能力 則變化多元;增強權能向度,呈現成員們自我權能提高;生活滿意向度,呈 現正向的改變。 二、質化研究結果:認知產生正向的改變、自我感提昇、主體性增強,人際交往 提昇、經濟與生活獨立自主,生活比較有目標、積極樂觀。 三、個人訂定的目標也有部分達成。 本研究發現:優勢觀點團體工作對受暴婦女復元產生的幫助因素如下: 一、團體工作的幫助:1.提供成員彼此互相支持的功能。2.團體動力激勵成員互 相的學習。3.提供成員學習的環境。4.提供心靈安全的避風港。 二、優點評量工具的幫助:1.成員有被重視與被尊重的感覺。2.發掘優點 3.看到正面的能量,激發希望。4.統整過去、現在與未來,幫助自我瞭解 三、個人計畫的幫助:1.生活有目標,增強信心。2.提供個人計畫檢視的功能。 3.有激勵的作用。4.學習規劃生活目標。 四、優點原則的幫助:在建立專業友誼關係、案主是助人關係中的指導者、社區 是資源綠洲、焦點在於優點而非病理等四個原則對於受暴婦女的復元都有 產生幫助的因素。 最後本研究根據結論與研究發現提供政策與實務兩方面之建議。 關

並列摘要


A Metamorphosis - A Study on Exercising Group Work from the Strength Perspective on Women Recovering from the Cycle of Violence School: Dept. of Social Policy and Social Work, College of Arts, National Chi Nan University Pages:232 Graduation: January, 2008 Degree: Master Graduate Student: Yueh-Er Tseng Advisor Name: Li-Yu Song Ph.D. Abstract This study intends to explore the effect of strength-based perceptive group work on the treatment of women in violence cycle. The main purposes of the study include: 1. To understand the changes in depression, stress coping, empowerment, and life satisfaction of abused women after participating in “Strength-based perspective group work”, and 2. To understand how the strength-based perspective group work helps promote the recovering of abused women. Both quantitative and qualitative methods are adopted in this study. Subjects are selected from clients referred to Changhua County Lifeline by Domestic Violence Prevention Center of Changhua County for subsequent treatment. Under the recommendation of social workers, six abused women (they are either married or divorced or separated), who have been repeatedly abused and are still in a violent environment, are asked to participate in our study. Conclusions: A. Quantitative result: Depression is reduced; no major change is noted in emotional coping; behavioral coping shows diversified modifications; all of the subjects exhibit enhanced self-empowerment; life satisfaction has shown positive changes. B. Qualitative result: After participating the strength-based perceptive group work, the subjects exhibit positive change in self-perception, enhanced concept of self and subjectivity, improved interpersonal relationship, financial independence and self-reliant, finding of their purpose in life, active and optimistic attitudes. C. The goals that they set have been partly achieved. The study has found the strength-based group work is beneficial to the abused women in the recovery process in the following way: A. Benefits of group work: 1. Provide a mutual support function. 2. Group dynamics motivates members to engage in mutual learning. 3. Provide a learning environment. 4. Provide a spiritual heaven for members. B. Benefits of strength assessment tool: 1. Members have a feeling of being valued and respected. 2. Discover strengths. 3. It is hope-inspiring and members begin to see positive energy 4. Help integrate past, present and future, and increase self understanding. C. Benefits of personal plan: 1. Help find their purpose in life and enhance their confidence. 2. Provide the function of reviewing one’s plan. 3. Help motivate individuals; 4. Learning to set goal for life. D. Benefits of strength principle: There are four strength principles: 1. The establishment of a friendship between the professional and the victim. 2. The victim is the instructor of the helping relationship. 3. The community is the oasis of resources. 4. The focus is on the strengths instead of pathology. All these four principles are found to be helpful to the recovery of abused women. Finally, the study attempted to provide data summaries and recommendations that could be used by social agencies or practitioners as well as a basis for future research efforts.

參考文獻


文部份
內政部性家庭暴力暨侵害防治委員會(2003a)。家庭暴力及性侵害個案管理工作模式研討會手冊。台北:內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會。
內政部家庭暴力暨性侵害防治委員會(2003b)。九十二年度中央對直轄市、縣(市)政府執行家庭暴力及性侵害防治業務績效考核報告。台北:內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會。
朱秉慧 (2001)。運用個案管理從事婚姻暴力服務之探討:以台北市為例。輔仁大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
宋麗玉 (2003b)。優點評量:才能、資源和想望的呈現。收錄於九十三年推動受暴婦女個案管理模式初階訓練手冊。內政部委託台灣社會政策學會辦理。

被引用紀錄


賴文珍(2012)。受暴女性經驗家之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315293342
姜依雲(2017)。從優勢觀點談女性單親新住民在台生活經驗〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2712201714434090

延伸閱讀