透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.226.187.24
  • 學位論文

某技術學院學生宿舍社會氣氛知覺與住宿功能滿意度之研究

Dorm’s social climate perception and satisfaction of accommodation function in student residence hall: case study for an Institute of Technology

指導教授 : 何進財
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


摘 要 本研究旨在探討「某技術學院學生宿舍社會氣氛知覺與住宿功能滿意度」,除探討案例學校宿舍社會氣氛知覺與住宿功能滿意度之現況、兩者之關係外,並探討哪些宿舍社會氣氛知覺可以預測住宿功能滿意度。 本研究採問卷調查法,以案例學校之日間部學生5082人為研究母群體,採分層隨機抽樣,共發放1284份問卷,回收問卷1277份,刪除廢卷共得985份有效的樣本。研究工具包含學生「宿舍社會氣氛知覺」、「住宿功能滿意度調查問卷」、個人基本資料,總量表信度分別為.913、.981。並以SPSS12.0進行資料統計分析,再以描述統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關、逐步多元迴歸分析來進行統計考驗。 根據實際所得資料,結果發現:一、案例學校住宿學生知覺之宿舍社會氣氛具備「支持」、「學生自主權」、「獨立」、的氣氛,較不具備「學業成就」、「知識」、「社交與競爭」的氣氛;二、案例學校住宿功能滿意度為中上程度,但其中以「休閒與交誼」功能滿意度最高,其次為「學習與發展」功能;三、個人背景因素、宿舍別、知否全體住宿、住宿期間返家次數等變項在宿舍社會氣氛知覺各層面具有顯著差異;四、年級、學制、自治參與程度、宿舍別、知否全體住宿等變項,在住宿功能滿意度各層面具有顯著差異;五、「宿舍社會氣氛知覺」與整體及各層面「住宿功能滿意度」具有顯著正相關,宿舍社會氣氛知覺變項共可解釋整體住宿功能滿意度變項總變異量的52%,其中以宿舍社會氣氛知覺的「革新」及「參與/適應」對住宿功能滿意度的「居住環境」、「休閒與交誼」及「整體住宿功能」的解釋力最大。 本研究歸納研究結果,作成結論,對學校宿舍輔導與服務相關單位、學生及家長,提出以下建議。 對學校宿舍輔導與服務相關單位的建議:一、營造具有「知識」與「學業成就」的宿舍社會氣氛;二、妥善規劃同儕輔導方案,促進學生的學習與發展;三、重視宿舍「革新」氣氛,求新求變開創新機;四、鼓勵學生參與社團或宿舍自治組織,增加學習機會;五、從宿舍教育學習方案著手,結合學系教務單位,辦理促進學生學習系列活動;六、把握學校獨具的優勢,展現「全體住宿」的特色;七、結合相關單位資源,積極規劃實施宿舍新生輔導活動;八、重視不同宿舍學生滿意度的差異;九、重新檢視學生需求,改善宿舍輔導與服務。 對學生的建議:一、把握宿舍的課後學習與自我發展機會;二、應積極參與社團與宿舍自治組織,培養多元社群能力。 對家長的建議:一、多關注子女在校住宿的生活情形;二、重視宿舍學習環境,積極鼓勵子女參與投入。 關鍵字:技術學院、學生宿舍、宿舍社會氣氛知覺、住宿功能滿意度

並列摘要


Abstract This research investigates the “dorm’s social climate perception and satisfaction of accommodation function in student residence hall: case study for an Institute of Technology”. Besides, the current status and relationship between the dorm’s social climate perception and satisfaction of accommodation function for the student residence hall are examined. Subsequently, the dorm’s social climate perception is utilized to predict the satisfaction of accommodation function. In addition, this research adopts the questionnaire investigation and 5082 daytime students are selected as the target population by stratified random sampling. There are 1284 questionnaires distributed and 1277 questionnaires are retrieved. By excluding the invalid questionnaires, there are 985 valid samples for the research. Furthermore, the research tools include the “dorm’s social climate perception”, “questionnaire for the satisfaction of accommodation function” and basic personal information of the students. The total scale reliability are .913 and .981, respectively. Statistical data analysis is implemented with SPSS12.0. Then, statistical tests are conducted with descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, and progressive multiple regression analysis. Based on the information collected, it is revealed that: 1. In the case study, the dorm’s social climate perceived by the students have more “support”, “student’s self-determination”, and “independence” climate than “academic achievement”, “knowledge”, and “social interaction and competition” climate. 2. The satisfaction of accommodation function is above average. Additionally, the highest satisfaction is “recreational and social” function, followed by the “learning and development” function. 3. In the aspects of dorm’s social climate perception, there are significant differences in the variables which include personal background factor, dormitory halls, acknowledgement of compulsory accommodation, and frequency of returning home during the accommodation period. 4. In the aspects for satisfaction of accommodation function, there are significant differences for the variables which include academic year, educational system, level of participation in autonomy, dormitory halls and acknowledgement of compulsory accommodation. 5. There is significant positive relation between the “dorm’s social climate perception” and overall “satisfaction of accommodation function”. The variables of dorm’s social climate perception are explanatory for the total variance of 52% in the overall satisfaction of accommodation function. Among the variables of dorm’s social climate perception, “innovation” and “participation/adaptation” have the largest explanatory power toward the satisfaction of accommodation function in “living environment”, “recreational and social”, and “overall accommodation function”. From the summary of the results, conclusion is made and the following suggestions are directed toward related dormitory counseling and service units, students, and parents. Suggestions for the related dormitories’ counseling and service units: 1. Construct dorm’s social climate with “knowledge” and “academic achievement”. 2. Develop a thorough plan for peer counseling to improve the student’s learning and development. 3. Emphasize on the “innovation” climate in the dorms to create new and better change, as well as initiating new opportunities. 4. Encourage the student to participate in students’ associations or dorm autonomous organization which increases learning opportunity. 5. Establish a dormitory educational learning plan and integrate with the academic administration units to organize series of activities which enhance the students’ learning. 6. Value the unique advantages of the school and demonstrate the characteristic of “compulsory accommodation”. 7. Integrate resources from the related units and actively implement the counseling activity for new dormitory students. 8. Pay attention to the difference in the satisfaction of dormitory students. 9. Reevaluate the students’ needs and improve the dormitory counseling and service. Suggestions for the students: 1. Value the opportunities for after-lesson studying and self-development in the dorms. 2. Participate actively in the students’ associations and dorm autonomous organization to cultivate the ability in multiple social abilities. Suggestions for the parents: 1. Show consideration for the living condition of children accommodating in the school. 2. Emphasize on the learning environment in the dormitory and actively encourage children to participate in the activities. Keywords: Institute of Technology, student residence hall, dorm’s social climate perception, satisfaction of accommodation function

參考文獻


張明輝(1999b)。九O年代中小學學校教育革新之策略與展望。教育研究集刊,43,103-137。
黃坤錦(1995)。美國大學的通識教育。台北市:師大書苑。
蘇家瑩(2003)。以Chickering、Josselson的心理社會發展理論-看大學女生社團領導經驗與心理社會發展歷程。公民訓育學報,13,121-147。
黃玉(2000)。大學學生事務的理論基礎--台灣大學生心理社會發展之研究。公民訓育學報,9,161-200。
黃玉(1996)。大學學生事務的角色與功能。公民訓育學報,5,167-192

被引用紀錄


王鉉蓉(2012)。學生宿舍管理員工作動機與組織承諾關係研究—以北區大學校院為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315292914

延伸閱讀