透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.223.32.230
  • 學位論文

國中學生健康促進生活型態與基本學力測驗成績之研究--以台南縣國中為例

Study on Health-promoting Lifestyle and the Basic Competence Test for Junior High School Students Results among Junior High School Students in Tainan County of Taiwan

指導教授 : 陳政友
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究目的主要在了解台南縣國中學生之社會人口學變項、健康促進生活型態及國中基本學力測驗成績,並探討其相關因素,以作為推動學生健康促進之參考。本研究採橫斷性調查研究法,以台南縣國中學生為母群體,立意取樣研究者服務之學校,有效問卷為346份。 研究結果如下: 一、研究對象在社會人口學分布中,男多於女,以平均身體質量指數來看,體態屬正常範圍;家庭社經地位偏低,智力成績等級多屬優及中等。在健康促進生活型態中:運動得分最高,其次依序是營養、人際支持、壓力處理、自我實現、健康責任。基本學力測驗成績總分平均232.4(標準差101.1)。 二、研究對象的社會人口學變項、健康促進生活型態的關係中,在營養方面,與智力測驗成績有顯著差異;在運動方面,與性別、智力測驗成績有顯著差異;在壓力處理方面,與性別、身體質量指數、家庭社經地位有顯著差異;在健康責任、自我實現、人際支持方面,與家庭社經地位、智力測驗成績有顯著差異。整體健康促進生活型態中,家庭社經地位高者及智力測驗成績優者,其健康促進生活型態較佳。 三、研究對象之基本學力測驗成績,與家庭社經地位、智力測驗成績之有顯著差異,且於各面向的健康促進生活型態成正相關。家庭社經地位屬於中或高的學生、智力測驗成績越優的學生、健康促進生活型態各面向越佳的學生,其基本學力測驗成績就越好。 四、本研究探討在社會人口學變項與健康促進生活型態對基學力測驗成績的預測,可解釋的62.2%總變異量,其中「家庭社經地位」、「智力測驗成績」、「營養」為主要預測變項,且以「智力測驗成績」影響最大,「營養」次之。 本研究依結論提出具體建議,提高研究對象健康促進生活型態,進而提升基本學力測驗成績。

並列摘要


This research aims to understand the social-demographic variables of junior high school students in Tainan County of Taiwan, health-promoting lifestyle and the results of the Basic Competence Test for Junior High School Students. Through the understanding of the items mentioned above, relevant factors are analyzed to serve as reference for the promotion of students’ health. This research is performed by the cross-section survey with Tainan County’s students as crucial population. 346 questionnaires were returned and the results of the research are shown below: 1.Among our objects of study, females are outnumbered by males regarding the social-demographic distribution. The average BMI of the objects is under the "normal" category. The family socioeconomic status tends to be lower than average while the IQ test results mostly belonging to the average or the higher levels. As for health-promotion lifestyle, it is the item of exercise in which the objects score the highest, and other items are ranked as nutrition, interpersonal support, stress management, self-actualization, and health responsibility. The objects’ average result of the Basic Competence Test for Junior High School Students (BCTJHS) is 232.4 (standard deviation 101.1). 2.In the relation between social-demographic distribution and health-promoting lifestyle, prominent difference can be found among objects with different BCTJHS results in nutrition; objects with different genders and IQ test results perform differently on exercise; objects with different genders, BMI, and family socioeconomic status perform differently on stress management; objects with different family socioeconomic status and IQ test results perform differently on health responsibility; objects with different family socioeconomic status and IQ test results perform differently on self-actualization; objects with different family socioeconomic status and IQ test results perform differently on interpersonal support. In the overall health-promoting lifestyle, the objects with higher family socioeconomic status and IQ test results have better health-promoting lifestyle. 3.There is a prominent difference in BCTJHS results among objects with different family socioeconomic status and IQ test results; this difference is in positive correlation with comprehensive health-promoting lifestyles. Students with middle or higher family socioeconomic status, better IQ test results, and good health-promoting lifestyle would have better BCTJHS results. 4.This research scrutinizes the impact of the social-demographic variables and health-promoting lifestyle on the prediction of BCTJHS results. The explainable overall accuracy is 62.2 %. Among all of the predictions, family socioeconomic status, IQ test results, and nutrition are main importance. It can be found that health-promoting lifestyle provides effective prediction of BCTJHS results while “IQ test results” is the most influential and “nutrition” is less to it. This research proposes practical suggestions for uplifting health-promoting lifestyle so as to boost BCTJHS results.

參考文獻


仇方娟(1997)。南區五專生健康促進生活型態及其相關因素。雄中學報,10,281-302。
姜逸群(2006)。健康促進與生活型態。學校體育雙月刊,16(3),31-35。
黃淑貞、姜逸群、賴香如、洪文綺、陳曉玟(2002)。台灣地區國小學童健康行為調查。行政院衛生署國民健康局九十一年度委託研究計劃。
黃毓華、邱啟潤(1997)。高雄地區大學生健康促進生活型態之預測因子。中華公共衛生雜誌,16(1), 24 -36。
黃錫美(2006)。潘德氏健康促進模式之介紹。北市醫學雜誌,3(6),853-858。

被引用紀錄


黃春太(2010)。臺灣南部地區國中生的社經地位、社會資本、生活型態與幸福感之研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315192306
LIU, S. H. (2011). 台北市高職夜間部學生健康生活型態及其相關因素之研究 [master's thesis, National Taiwan Normal University]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315263654
陳梓喬(2011)。體適能與學業成績及情緒智力之相關研究-以新北市立福和國中為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315242058
黃怡貞(2012)。出國民眾對機場發燒篩檢措施實施之認知、態度與滿意度研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315311640
陳志遠(2012)。數理資優班學生體適能之研究-以臺北市國民中學為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315270537

延伸閱讀