透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.221.174.248
  • 學位論文

從離散值分析學生認知型態與遊戲策略之相關研究

Based on Grid Ware Dispersion to analyze students’ cognitive styles Effecting on their game strategies

指導教授 : 洪榮昭
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究旨在探討在數位拼圖遊戲中,從Grid Ware之離散值分析個體認知型態與遊戲策略的選擇上是否有差異。 本研究採用實地實驗法,正式研究樣本為高年級學童共210人,其中100人進行歐洲地圖版的數位拼圖遊戲,另110人進行臺灣地圖版的數位拼圖遊戲。歸納出四種主要的遊戲策略類型:1.隨機型;2.試誤修正型;3.分析演繹型;4.固著型。 根據實驗結果發現:1.場地獨立型學童的數位拼圖遊戲成績顯著高於場地依賴型學童。2. 學童認知型態與提示按鈕次數有差異:愈傾向場地獨立型的學童,使用提示按鈕次數愈少;愈傾向場地依賴型的學童,使用提示按鈕次數愈多。3. 不同認知型態的學童,其遊戲策略關卡選擇的離散值無顯著差異。4.場地獨立型的學童對於難度高的關卡選擇次數高於場地依賴型的學童。5. 場地獨立型的學童與場地依賴型的學童在數位拼圖遊戲策略類型上有差異:場地獨立型且策略成功,遊戲策略以分析演繹型為主進行挑戰難度高的關卡,且無隨機型;場地依賴型且策略失敗,其遊戲策略主要以演繹型及試誤修正型進行難度低的關卡。

並列摘要


In this research, focus on using Grid Ware dispersion to analyze the achievement on different game strategies with regard to the participants’ different cognitive styles in the computer-based jigsaw game. By using field experiment, the research included 210 K5 students as experimental subjects, of which 100 students are tested by Europe map jigsaw version, and the others are tested by Taiwan map jigsaw version. The type of game strategies can be classified into: 1. Trail and error thinking; 2. Heuristic thinking; 3. Analogical thinking; 4. Fixated thinking in this study. The experimental results indicated: 1. In general, the scores that field independent (FI) student obtained in jigsaw game are significant higher than that of field dependent (FD) student obtained. 2. The cognitive style of students is related to the number of using cue (miniature map). The more FI tended student will use the less cues; whereas, the more FD tended student will use the more cues. 3. In using dispersion to analyze game strategies with regard to cognitive styles are no significant differences. 4. The frequencies of selecting high challenge games (6*6 pieces) by FI students is higher than that by FD students. 5. As FI student with higher score, their game strategy is mainly depending on “Analogical thinking” to high challenge game; on the other hand, if the FD student with lower score, their game strategies are inclined to apply “Analogical thinking and Heuristic thinking” to low challenge game.

參考文獻


林展立(2005)。演進式遊戲的內容設計與遊戲策略之研究:以Strike Up遊戲為例。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系博士論文,未出版,臺北。
莊耀嘉(1996)。兒童品性異常的成因:低自制力與不良休閒活動。犯罪學期刊,2,125- 150。
林清山(1985)。魏肯氏心裡分化理論相關問題之實證性研究。師大教育心理學報,18,39-54。
許湞婷(2006)。大腦處理資訊能力之定量測量-線上拼圖遊戲的應用。國立臺灣師範大學物理學系碩士論,未出版,臺北。
Power, T. G. (2000). Play and exploration in children and animals. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

被引用紀錄


鄭文揚(2012)。技藝競賽選手的認知型態、自我決定與教師專業表現對其競賽成績之影響〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2012.00205

延伸閱讀