透過您的圖書館登入
IP:52.90.211.141
  • 學位論文

國中生與其父母之嘲笑風格及其同理心之相關研究

The relationships between Pho-Phi-Kat and empathy of junior high school students and their parents

指導教授 : 陳學志
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究旨在探討國中生與其父母之嘲笑風格及同理心的相關情形,並且檢驗不同性別國中生、以及國中生父親與母親在嘲笑風格與同理心之差異情形。研究者以「嘲笑風格量表精簡版」、「同理心量表」為研究工具,採用立意取樣,抽取五校738組學生與其父母,回收後之有效樣本為343位學生、360位父親及405位母親。結果顯示:(1)國中生父親與母親之嘲笑風格具有顯著差異,父親「喜被笑」與「喜笑人」特質顯著高於母親;在國中生父母之嘲笑風格的相關方面,父親的「喜笑人」與母親「喜笑人」、「喜被笑」達顯著正相關。(2)國中男生「喜笑人」顯著高於國中女生;國中女生在同理心普遍顯著高於國中男生。(3)父親「喜笑人」與子女「怕被笑」達顯著正相關;母親「喜被笑」、「喜笑人」與子女「喜被笑」、「喜笑人」具顯著正相關;子女「喜被笑」與「同理心」達顯著正相關;子女的「喜笑人」與「同理心」達顯著負相關。由本研究結果可知,父母與子女的嘲笑風格具有相關存在,且父親和母親分別與子女之相關情形不同。職是之故,研究者建議學校可辦理親職講座,向父母宣導正向的嘲笑風格,藉此間接改善子女之嘲笑行為;另外,由於國中生嘲笑風格與同理心有負相關存在,因此學校可藉由開設人際與同理心課程,輔導國中生之嘲笑行為。

關鍵字

國中生 父母 嘲笑風格 怕被笑 喜被笑 喜笑人 同理心

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between Pho-Phi-Kat and empathy of junior high school students and their parents. The measurements used were PhoPhiKat-30 Scale and The Interpersonal Reactivity Inventory. 343 junior high school students from 5 schools,360 their fathers and 405 their mothers participated in this study. The results are as followed:1)Among their parents, there were difference on Gelotophilia and Katagelasticism. Katagelasticism of fathers both had a significant and positive correlation with Gelotophilia and Katagelasticism of mothers. 2)On gender, there were differences on Katagelasticism and empathy. 3) Katagelasticism of fathers had a significant and positive correlation with Gelotophobia of children. Katagelasticism of mothers had a significant and positive correlation with Gelotophilia and Katagelasticism of children. Gelotophobia of children had a significant and positive correlation with empathy. Katagelasticism of children had a significant and negative correlation. After researches and analyses, three ridicule styles of parents had a correlation with children, school could offer educational activities to improve the ridicule style of parents. And three ridicule styles of students had a correlation with empathy, school could offer interpersonal and empathy courses to improve the ridicule style of students.

參考文獻


詹雨臻、陳學志、卓淑玲、R. A. Martin(2011)。區分良善與有害的幽默──中文版幽默風格量表的發展。測驗學刊,正向心理學專刊,207-234。
陳學志、詹雨臻、Ruch, W., & Proyer, R.T. (2011)。被笑恐懼相關特質的測量與信度及效度之評估。測驗學刊,58(11),119-145。
蕭如怡(2010)。國中教師同理心、挫折復原力與工作熱忱之研究。國立臺北教育大學生命教育與健康促進研究所碩士論文。
王世億(2007)。友情內涵之建構及與同理心相關之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
任以容(1994)。國中生所知覺的父母教養態度、親子衝突因應模式與其人際困擾傾向之關係研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。

被引用紀錄


楊琬琳(2014)。高中生網路霸凌認知、情感與行為之相關研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846%2fTKU.2014.00851
何瑞芬(2014)。青少年同理心與親子關係滿意度:感恩的中介效果〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840%2fcycu201400546

延伸閱讀