透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.157.186
  • 學位論文

利用紙片電噴灑質譜快速篩選及毛細管電泳質譜測定唾液中含4-氯安非他命的開發與研究

Rapid screening and determination of 4-chloroamphtamine in saliva by paper spray-mass spectrometry and capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry

指導教授 : 林震煌
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本實驗開發了一種新型藥物篩選系統,包括濾紙電噴霧質譜(PS-MS)和毛細管電泳電噴灑質譜法(CE-ESI-MS)的方法。本實驗系統可以很容易地切換的PS-MS快速篩選樣品或傳統CE-ESI-MS分離方法,並利用同時共享同一台質譜而獲得詳細的質譜信息。在PS-MS情況下,當用尖端為(15度)的濾紙時,從紙尖到質譜入口的最佳距離大約口為7.7 mm,而最佳化CE-ESI尖端的距離為13.5 mm。另外本實驗是使用4 -氯安非他命作為測試樣品,而PS-MS和CE-ESI-MS偵測極限經過測試後確定分別為0.1和0.25 ppm。以下是使用PS-MS和CE-ESI-MS和實驗條件下得到的結果的比較與說明。

並列摘要


A novel drug-screening system, consisting of paper spray-mass spectrometry (PS-MS) and a capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (CE-ESI-MS) method was developed. This system can be easily switched either to PS-MS for rapidly screening samples or to the traditional CE-ESI-MS method for separation and to obtain detailed mass spectral information, while sharing the same mass spectrometer. In the former case, when a sharp (15º-tip) chromatography paper was used, the optimized distance from the paper tip to the mass inlet was 7.7 mm, whereas the optimized distance for the CE-ESI tip was ~ 13.5 mm. Using 4-chloro-amphetamine as a model compound, the limits of detection for PS-MS and CE-ESI-MS were determined to ~ 0.1 and 0.25 ppm, respectively. Comparisons of results obtained using PS-MS and CE-ESI-MS and the experimental conditions are described.

參考文獻


[52] Hiroyuki Inoue, Yuko T. Iwata, TatsuyukiKanamori, Hajime Miyaguchi, Kenji Tsujikawa, Kenji Kuwayama, HiroeTsutsumi, MunehiroKatagi, Hitoshi Tsuchihashi, TohruKishi, Jpn. J. Sci. Tech. Iden. 9 (2004) 165.
[51] Abdel-Hay KM, Awad T, DeRuiter J, Clark CR, Forensic Sci. Int. 195 (2010) 78.
[38] T. L. Chang, K. W. Chen, Y. D. Lee, K. Fan, J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 13 (1999) 106.
[39] P. Meng, D. Zhu, H. He, Y. Wang, F. Guo, L. Zhang, Anal.Sci. 25 (2009) 1115.
[6] M. Z. Huang, S. S. Jhang, C. N. Cheng, S. C. Cheng, J. Shiea, Analyst 135 (2010) 759.

延伸閱讀