透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.151.106
  • 學位論文

大專甲組桌球雙打技術分析

The Skill Analysis of Doubles for Table Tennis In College Sports

指導教授 : 林靜萍
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


大專甲組桌球雙打技術分析 研究生:胡志鋒 指導教授:林靜萍 摘要 本研究主要目的為瞭解大專甲組桌球賽,雙打之比賽勝負對球隊勝負之影響、三段技術指標與技術型態及致勝球落點分佈,藉以提供國內教練在從事桌球運動訓練與比賽之參考。 本研究以參加九十三年度全國大專校院運動會甲組桌球團體賽的二十支球隊,七十八場雙打賽為研究對象,以桌球比賽過程記錄表為研究工具,所得數據以描述性統計及獨立樣本t考驗進行統計分析,所得結論為: 一、大專甲組桌球團體賽,男、女子組雙打勝負對球隊勝負有絕影 響。 二、大專男子甲組雙打三段技術指標評估:在發球搶攻段及接發球搶 攻段得分率指標為「優秀」,使用率為「及格」。相持段得分率 指標為「及格」,使用率為「不及格」。 三、大專女子甲組雙打三段技術指標評估:在發球搶攻段得分率指標 為「良好」,使用率為「及格」。接發球搶攻段得分率指標為 「優秀」,使用率為「及格」。相持段得分率及使用率指標皆為 「不及格」。 四、大專甲組桌球雙打不同性別在各段使用率上有差異:三段技術的 六個變項間男甲組在發球搶攻段、接發球搶攻段中使用率高於女 甲組,相持段使用率女甲組高於男甲組。 五、大專男、女甲組雙打的得分技術類別以正手攻擊(包含側身攻) 為主。 六、大專男、女甲組雙打得分及失分落點在右半出檯區比例最多。 七、我國大專甲組桌球雙打不同性別落點分佈差異情形,女甲組擊球 落點在左半區出檯高於男甲組有差異,其他三個區域均無差異。 針對研究結果,本研究提出下列建議: 一、雙打佔團體賽比重約三到四成,但雙打勝可影響團體勝負七成, 對團體賽勝負有絕對之影響。 二、發搶段及接搶段表現佳,可繼續強化,但相持段技術則要加強。 三、在訓練過程中對擊球落點也要嚴格要求,在比賽應用才能控制節 奏及方向。 關鍵詞:大專甲組、雙打、桌球三段技術。

並列摘要


The Skill Analysis of Doubles for Table Tennis(Grup A) In College Sports Student:Chih-feng Hu Advisor:Ching-ping Lin Abstract The purpose of this study was to understand the influence of scoring victories of Doubles teams(grup A)for table- tennis three-stage skill analysis, and what spots the smashed shots possibly went to in College Sports.Doing this reseach would certainly give more information to our national table tennis coaches. The subjects of this study included twenty table tennis teams(grup A) competing in College Sports in 2004. There were also 78 games studied by the researcher who used the process of match records as a studying tool. The researcher analyzed these results through Descriptive Statistics and Independent t Test.the summary was as follows: 1.Winning or not for male and female table tennis Doubles teams(grup A)had an absolute influence on the competition results for their own teams in College Sports. 2.Evaluation of the three-stage skill index of college female Doubles teams:The index of scoring percentage of serve-then-aggress part and receive-then-aggress part was “Excellent” ,and the using percentage was ”Pass”。 The index of scoring percentage of rally part was ”Pass”, but the using percentage was”No Pass”. 3.Evaluation of the three-stage skill index of college female Doubles teams :The index of scoring percentage of serve-then-aggress part was”Good” and the using percentage was”Pass”.The index of scoring percentage of receive-then-aggress part was”Excellent”,and the using percentage was”Pass” Both the index of scoring percentage of rally part and the using percentage were” No Pass”. 4.There were differences in different genders about using percentage in each section.The six variables in three- stage skill showed that the using percentage of male teams,serve-then-aggress part, receive-then- aggress part was higer than that of female teams,but the using percentage of female teams’rally part was higher than that of male teams’. 5.Both male and female teams mainly used forehand as a way of scoring. 6.The spots of scoring points or losing points for both male and female teams basically lay on the left area. 7.Different genders obviously made the spots of striking balls also different:The spots of striking balls for female teams often lay on the left area and easily got out of the table; that was different from male teams.But,the other three areas were the same. I’d like to make my suggestions from the final result of this research as below : 1. The numbers of Doubles teams were about 30 percent to 40 percent out of a total ,but the winning of the Double teams would make a significant influence reaching as high as 70 percent on the total competition. 2. Both the serve-then-agress part and the receive-then- aggress part were very good; both of them could be strengthened. But the techniques of rally part should be trained more. 3.Be strict to ask for players to strike the right spots during the training process, and then players can control the rhythms and directions. Key words: College Sports grup A ,(is for Physical Education student in College or student who are admitted to college without taking any exam.) Doubles, Three-stage Skill Analysis,

參考文獻


周禾程(2002)。系統觀察法與電腦資訊在運動教育學上的運用。
Barrett,K.R.(1979)Observation for teaching and coaching.
丘鐘惠(1982)。現代乒乓球技術的研究。北京:人民體育出版社。
究。2002年國際運動訓練科學研討會(抽印本),1-5。
朱昌勇(1999)。我國大專桌球國手三段技術、心理變項與成績表現

被引用紀錄


吳棨舜(2006)。不同回饋教學法及自我口語提示法對桌球正手殺球教學效果之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0712200716095844
陳嬋茹(2016)。植基於人格特質之桌球前三板雙打技戰術分析研究及系統開發〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-1108201714025313

延伸閱讀