意象使用型態、意象能力在不同自信心的運動員之差異探討--檢驗運動員知覺的意象功能

Differences in imagery content and imagery ability between high and low confident athletes—Examining athletes’ perceptions of the functions of imagery

林啟賢(chi-hsian Lin)

指導教授 ： 簡曜輝

國立臺灣師範大學/運動與休閒學院/體育學系/博士(2004年)

摘要

無資料

關鍵字

意象 ； 運動意象量表 ； 修訂版動作意象量表 ； 自信心 ； 運動員知覺的意象功能

並列摘要

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to examine how high and low trait sport confidence athletes differed in their imagery content and imagery ability, and to examine athletes’ perceptions of the functions of imagery. The framework of this study was based on both Martin’s (1999) model of “Mental Imagery Use in Sport” and Marphy’s and Martin’s (2002) model of “Three Level of Imagery in Sport”. First, both the tools of sport imagery and movement imagery were revised, and then to examine these two tools of reliability and validity. Second, this study was to assess the differences between high and low trait sport confidence athletes on the imagery content and the imagery ability. Third, this study was to examine athletes’ perceptions of the functions of imagery.Two stages of data collection were executed. At the first stage, subjects were 237 student athletes (140 male and 97 female) from four universities in Taiwan in order to testify the reliability and validity of sport imagery and movement imagery. At the second stage, subjects were 395 student athletes (227 male and 168 female) from six universities around Taiwan. Data were analyzed by LISREL8.50 and SPSS 12.0. There were internal consistency analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, profile analysis, cumulative percents and chi-square test for goodness of fit . The results of this study were following: (1)The results showed high sport confident athletes had better on imagery content (motivational specific, motivational general-arousal, cognitive general, cognitive specific, and motivational general-mastery) than low sport confident athletes did. High confident athletes had better on both kinesthetic and visual imagery abilities than low confident athletes did；(2)For the high confident athletes, there were not differences among motivational general-mastery and others types of imagery content (motivational specific, motivational general-arousal, cognitive general, and cognitive specific). For the low confident athletes, there were differences among motivational general-mastery and others types of imagery content；(3)There were differences among the perception of function of imagery and five types of imagery content. That is, the content of imagery did have different individual meaning for each athlete.

並列關鍵字

imagery ； sport imagery questionnaire ； movement imagery questionnaire-reviesed ； confidence ； athletes’ perceptions of the functions of imagery

參考文獻

邱玉惠 (2001)。運動員心理技能量表之編製。國立體育學院教練研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園。

黃崇儒 (2000b)。中文版運動員心理因應技能量表的修訂。北體學報，7，1-14。

Hall, C. R., & Martin, K. A. (1997). Measuring movement imagery abilities: A revision of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire. Journal of Mental Imagery, 21, 143-154.

石恆星、洪聰敏 （2002）。意象活動之神經生理機轉。中華體育，63，45-52。

洪聰敏 (1998)。腦波：探討運動及身體活動心理學的另一扇視窗。中華體育，44，63-74。