遠距離投籃訓練對大專男子籃球選手三分球命中率之影響

The Influence of Long Range Shooting Training to 3-Point Shooting Percentage of Male College Basketball Players

陳建樺(Jean-Hua Chen)

指導教授 ： 許樹淵

國立臺灣師範大學/運動與休閒學院/體育學系/碩士(2005年)

摘要

本研究之目的為：透過遠距離投籃訓練，探討球員在訓練時對投籃距離負荷增加的適應，是否能夠提高三分線投籃命中率、三分線投籃效率及達到穩定的三分線投籃命中率趨向。研究方法是以18名大專男子籃球選手為研究對象（平均年齡為 21.78±2.64 歲，身高為 177.67±5.06 公分，體重為 72.33±6.74 公斤），依前測成績蛇行排列同質性分組分為遠距離訓練組（投籃距離8.00公尺）、三分線訓練組（投籃距離6.25公尺）及控制組等三組，各組進行每週兩次每次150球，為期8週的投籃訓練，並在前4周訓練後進行中測，後4周訓練後進行後測，將所收集之實驗數據，以SPSS for windows 10.0套裝統計軟體，進行混合設計二因子變異數及趨向分析，以及相依樣本二因子變異數及趨向分析，考驗各組進步趨向的顯著差異性，統計數值均定為α＝.05，結果發現：
一、 不同分期測驗命中率達顯著差異，而不同分期測驗與組別有交互作用（p＜.05）。
二、 遠距離組在後測之投籃效率顯著優於控制組（p＜.05）。
三、 三分線組之變異數分析及趨向分析在測驗分期達到顯著差異，並且於中測及後測時於位置三之成績顯著優於前測（p＜.05）。
四、 三分線組在中測的投籃效率及投籃命中率顯著優於控制組，並且於後測之位置一及位置三之成績顯著優於控制組（p＜.05）。

關鍵字

遠距離投籃訓練 ； 大專男子籃球選手 ； 三分球命中率 ； 變異數分析

並列摘要

Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore how the male college basketball players would be adapting themselves in long range shooting training load, to increase the percentage, efficiency and stability of 3-point shooting. There were 18 male college basketball players (average age: 21.78+2.64 years old; average height: 177.67+ 5.06cm; average weight: 72.33+ 6.74kg) participated in this study, and these players were divided in three groups: long range training group (8 meters); 3-point line training group (6.25meters); and the control group according to the pre-test results. All of the groups were given shooting training for 8 weeks (150 shots for each time, twice a week); the mid-test was given at the end of the four weeks. The data collected were processed and analyzed using 2-way mixed design, 2-way repeated measure ANOVAs and Trend Analysis with SPSS 10.0 (Windows Edition). The significant level was set for α＝.05. The finding of this study goes as follows:
1. The shooting percentage in different tests is significantly different, and there is interaction between different groups and tests (p<.05).
2. The shooting efficiency of long range group is better than control group in post-test (p<.05).
3. The ANOVA and Trend Analysis of the 3-point group is significantly different among testing period; and the players in position 3 has higher grades in the mid-test and the post-test than the pre-test (p<.05).
4. The shooting efficiency and percentage of the 3-point group is significantly better than control group, and the post-test of the 3-point group in position 1 and 3 are significantly better than the ones of control group (p<.05).

並列關鍵字

Long range shooting training ； Male college basketball player ； 3-point shooting percentage ； ANOVA

參考文獻

東方介德及李雲光（2004）。男子籃球比賽攻守技術發展之探討。大專體育，70期，143-148頁。

梁嘉音、簡曜輝及卓俊伶（1998）。距離對籃球投籃動作型式的影響：個案研究。中華民國體育學會體育學報，第二十五輯，199-208頁。

阮如鈞（1981）。競技運動訓練的理論與方法。台北市：中華民國體育學會。

曹建仲、張延飛（1994）。籃球比賽成績的攻防技術代表性項目之編製。中華民國體育學會體育學報，第十八輯，113-124頁。

Krestonikov, A. （1951）. The physiological basis of physical education.