高等教育評鑑對我國學術自由之影響-以95年度系所評鑑為例

A Study of the effects of Higher Education Evaluation on Academic

藍婉心(Wan Hsin,Lan)

指導教授 ： 王如哲

國立臺灣師範大學/教育學院/教育政策與行政研究所/碩士(2006年)

摘要

無資料

關鍵字

學術自由 ； 高等教育 ； 評鑑 ； 系所評鑑

並列摘要

A Study of the effects of Higher Education Evaluation on
Academic Freedom in Taiwan-Based on the program evaluation on 2006

Abstract

The purposes of this research are finds out about the current academic's view on the academic freedom in Taiwan, exploring the influence of the evaluation of the evaluation of the higher education on the academic freedom in Taiwan, and understanding the practice problems in current higher education evaluation mechanism. Meanwhile, based on the finding and conclusion, this research will provide development strategies to balance the higher education and protecting academic freedom, and the suggestion according ly to the relevant organizations and personnel's reference.
This research adopts questionnaire survey and interview. and carries on research through literature review,. First, Questionnaires were delivered to 17 universities, focus on teachers and department directors.
The statistics software tool used for the questionnaire analysis with SPSS for Windows10.0; Secondly, four department directors and two teachers were chosen to be interviewed in the way of semi-structure interview.

The conclusions derived from the literature review, the questionnaire survey, and interviews are as follows:
1. Teacher's view on the of academic freedom of Taiwan, focus on three
aspects : freedom to teach ,freedom to research, and freedom to institution operation.
2. The evaluation cause departments overemphasize that the importance on
peer review, and lose the function of self-improvement of the self-evaluation.
3. Faced the first program evaluation, the prepare time for every department is
different. The prepare time is related to the time the department existed, and
the longer history a entire has, it needs more time since the materials file is
numerous and needs time to prepare.
4. For the new department, is it explore with developing stage, unable to react to run a school quality and performance a certain degree promptly in short time to at still.
5. If want to use the evaluation knows department quality of running a school, it is that the executive holds the attitude that is comparatively kept.
6. The design of the system and planning may face the difficult: excessive to emphasize internationalization, transplant external experience with is it make the transition normal school institute predicament of development inever consider while planning to list in to face.
7. Higher education evaluation system at first, be should not to combine the
education policy of exist mechanism.
8. Senior professor on higher education in the effects of Higher Education
evaluation on teaching activity, academic research and organization
independent to influence and all pay the high affirmation.
9. Different position teachers have different opinion on “evaluation promote
teaching activity towards Standardization”, “evaluation results push teacher
frequently on content of courses”, and” evaluation results teacher particular
stress on research work but not teach the activity to implement “.
10. Department directors suffer more pressurethan normal teachers when facing the evaluation of the evaluation of higher education.

Based on the discoveries mentioned above, the suggestions provided in this research are as follows:

1. For the higher educational institution:
should pay more attention to higher education and the effects of the evaluation on teaching activity, academy while operating research and organization act on one's own on the influence brought.

2 .For education authorities
(1) The country has obligation to keep balance between thehigher education evaluation and academic freedom,and gives assistance in case of necessity.
(2) The funds for higher education should be added in adequately time, to improving higher education quality and level, strengthening whole higher education in the face of the international competitiveness.

3. For the Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council in Taiwan should,
(1) Set up local standard in higher education evaluation indicator, and amendment the indicator based on speciality of each program.
(2) Provdinga guidance to the department understands to understand the purpose of higher education evaluation and to internal the evaluation system to a part of the higher education institutions.
(3) Higher education evaluation system at first, be should not to combine the
education policy of exist mechanism.

4. For the further study
(1)To broaden the study to each aspect in academic freedom , and more detail research between analysis and higher education evaluation to close of connecting with academic freedom.
(2)To broaden the study to other universities and colleges than normal schools for making sure that the higher education evaluation may cause influence to teacher , and if any, what kind of influence may be caused.

並列關鍵字

academic freedom ； the higher education ； evaluation ； programme evaluation