中小學體育基本學力指標之研究

The Study of Physical Education Learning Performance Indicators in Elementary and High School

廖貴鋒(kuei-feng liao)

指導教授 ： 黃政傑博士 ； 許義雄博士

國立臺灣師範大學/運動與休閒學院/體育學系/博士(2001年)

摘要

本研究旨在建構一套適合我國情境的中小學體育基本學力指標，據以評定我國體育課程的教學品質與整體學力情形，作為體育課程發展、教科書編輯、教學實施、教學評鑑之參考。
為達成此目的，本研究首先進行相關文獻的探討，其範圍包括：1.有關學力指標之意涵；2.國內外體育課程的目標與內容分析；3.國內外體育學力指標之相關文獻探討；以及4.學力指標的建構方法。
其次，進行得懷術的研究程序。藉以蒐集不同背景專家學者的意見和建立共識。得懷術小組成員包括教育體育學者、中小學校長、中小學體育教師與民間文教及企管專家，共有15位專家學者。第一次問卷係根據文獻探討的結果編製而成。問卷調查連續實施三次，所有諮詢委員均全程參與並寄回各次問卷。
經由上述程序，本研究發展出一套「中小學體育基本學力指標」，同時並提出四點結論：
一、體育基本學力指標可作為瞭解學生之體育學習水準。
二、體育基本學力指標建構宜兼重目標與評量兩向度。
三、採用得懷術的方法建構中小學體育基本學力指標，能夠蒐集不同的意見和建立共識。
四、中小學基本學力指標的建構，經由專家學者的凝聚共識，已具有相當高的可行性。
根據研究結果，本研究也分別對有關單位和對後續研究提出數點建議。

關鍵字

體育 ； 中小學 ； 基本學力 ； 指標

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was to produce a set of physical education learning performance indicators for elementary and high schools in Taiwan. The physical education learning performance indicators would be used as criteria for judging and improving physical education teaching quality and as guidelines for education reform.
In order to develop the physical education learning performance indicators, this study expected firstly to explore: (1) the conceptions of learning performance indicators, (2) Analysis the physical education objectives and content in several countries, (3) Review the functions and components of learning performance indicators and learning standards and (4) group decision-making methods for developing learning performance indicators.
Secondly, the Delphi technique was employed to collect various views and aggregate consensus from a panel of 15 experts, consisting of educational scholars, principals, physical educators, and leaders of non-official education and business management institutes. An initial inventory of learning performance indicators was compiled from the above literature review and panel discussion. A three-round Delphi was conducted to rate the importance of the learning performance indicators, and all participants completed and returned their questionnaires in each round.
A set of 50 important academic indicators was selected on the basis of aforementioned study procedures. These learning performance indicators were divided into five categories including: cognitive, motor skill, social behavior, exercise habit, and physical fitness.
The conclusions of this study are as follows:
1.The physical education learning performance indicators could be used as an effective means of evaluation of students learning levels.
2.The construct of the physical education learning performance indicators should focus on both objective and evaluation system.
3.The adoption of Delphi technique in establishing the physical education learning performance indicators is helpful in accumulating different opinions and forming consensus.
4.The established of physical education learning performance indicators from a panel of experts which to aggregate consensus, were proved to be highly feasible.
Finally, this study recommends some suggestions for applying the physical education learning performance indicators and provides suggestions for the references of related authorities and further research.