本研究旨在探討台灣地區國中教師休閒、休閒教育態度與休閒教育進修之需求,並根據研究結果提出具體建議,以供未來規劃休閒教教育進修活動和學校實施休閒教育之參考。 本研究採用文獻分析、問卷調查等方法蒐集相關資料。使用之研究工具為根據研究目的與待答問題,蒐集相關文獻資料與量表,編製之「國民中學教師休閒教育態度與進修需求調查表」。調查所得資料採用次數分配、平均數、標準差、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、典型相關等統計方法加以處理。 根據研究發現,歸納研究結論如下: 一、78.4%之台灣地區國中教師贊成國中實施休閒教育。 二、國中教師對休閒與休閒教育均持有正向態度。 三、國中教師在休閒教育態度上,因不同任教領域而有顯著差異。 四、國中教師對於休閒教育進修需求趨向於積極。而教師之需求以「休 閒資源」最高,其次為「休閒認知」,最後為「自我認知」與「休閒技能」。 五、國中教師休閒教育進修需求因不同任教領域教師而呈現顯著差異。 六、國中教師休閒、休閒教育態度與休閒教育進修需求,兩者之間有關聯性存在。 根據研究結果,本研究提出對教育行政機關、學校教師與未來研究等相關建議,作為未來規劃教師進修活動與實施休閒教育參考依據。
The purpose of this study was to examine the attitudes of leisure & leisure education as well as the needs assessment of leisure education in-service training on Junior High School teachers. Further, based on the research findings, this study aimed to propose concrete suggestions as the reference for future planning and its implementation of in-service training on leisure education in Junior High School. This study used documentary analysis and questionnaires to collect the data. The research tool employed was the “Scale of Junior High School Teachers’ Attitudes toward Leisure Education and Their Needs for In-service Training” compiled and revised on the basis of this study purpose, research questions, and the relative documentary data and scales. The collected data were analyzed by frequency, mean, standard deviation, t-test, one-way ANOVA, and canonical correlation. The main findings were as follows: 1.78.4% of teachers approved to implement leisure education in Junior High Schools. 2.Most of teachers had positive attitudes to both leisure and leisure education. 3.The leisure education attitudes of teachers varied greatly due to the difference of teaching fields. 4.The in-service training needs for leisure education of teachers tended to be active. Among the needs category, “leisure resources” ranked the highest. The second was “leisure awareness” and the lowest were “self-awareness” and “leisure skill”. 5.The needs for in-service training in leisure education differed significantly in teaching fields. 6.The attitudes toward leisure and leisure education of teachers were significantly related to their in-service training needs on leisure education. According to the findings above, this study proposed some suggestions for educational authority, teachers, and future studies as the reference for future planning and the implementation of in-service training for teachers on leisure education.