本研究旨在探討台北縣市不同性別大學生共依附與愛情態度的關係。本研究以台北縣市公私立大學、獨立學院的大一到大四男女大學生948人為研究對象,並採取問卷調查法進行資料收集,所使用的研究工具包含「共依附量表」和「愛情態度量表」。調查結果分別以單因子變異數分析及典型相關統計方法處理。本研究主要發現如下: 一、不同性別大學生在共依附量表上有顯著的差異情形。 男性大學生在共依附的總分,及「他人焦點/自我忽視」、「內科問題」、「隱藏自我負向情緒」和「原生家庭問題」分量表上的得分皆顯著高於女性大學生;分量表「低自我價值感」在性別上無顯著差異。 二、不同性別大學生在愛情態度分量表上有顯著的差異情形。 男性大學生在「熱情愛」、「奉獻愛」和「遊戲愛」分量表上的得分顯著高於女性大學生;而「友誼愛」和「現實愛」分量表上,女性大學生得分顯著高於男性大學生;分量表「瘋狂愛」在性別上無顯著差異。 三、大學生的共依附與愛情態度之相關 (一)大學生的共依附程度愈高,則愈傾向「奉獻愛」和「瘋狂愛」。 (二)大學生的「他人焦點/自我忽視」愈高,「隱藏自我負向情緒」愈低時,則愈傾向「熱情愛」、「現實愛」與「奉獻愛」,愈不傾向「遊戲愛」。 (三)大學生的「隱藏自我負向情緒」、「原生家庭問題」愈高時,則愈傾向「遊戲愛」,愈不傾向「瘋狂愛」。 四、不同性別大學生的共依附與愛情態度之相關 (一)男性大學生的共依附程度愈高時,則在愛情上愈傾向「瘋狂愛」與「遊戲愛」;女性大學生共依附程度愈高時,則愈傾向「瘋狂愛」和「奉獻愛」。 (二)男性大學生的「他人焦點/自我忽視」愈高,「原生家庭問題」愈低時,則愈傾向「熱情愛」、「友誼愛」、「奉獻愛」與「瘋狂愛」,愈不傾向「遊戲愛」。 (三)男性大學生的「他人焦點/自我忽視」愈高,「低自我價值感」與「隱藏自我負向情緒」愈低時,則愈傾向「熱情愛」、「現實愛」和「遊戲愛」。 (四)女性大學生的「他人焦點/自我忽視」愈高,「隱藏自我負向情緒」愈低時,則愈傾向「熱情愛」、「友誼愛」、「現實愛」與「奉獻愛」,愈不傾向「遊戲愛」。 最後根據本研究結果進行討論,並提供建議做為未來輔導工作與相關研究的參考。
The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationships between codependency and love attitude for University Students in Taiwan. The sample consisted of 948 college students from l3 universities in Taipei area(424 males,524 females). Instruments used in this study included the Chinese Codependency Assessment Tool and the Love Attitude Scale. Data obtained in this study were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and canonical correlation analysis. The main findings were as follows: 1.Gender differences on Codependency. Males had significantly higherseveral codependency scales(viz.,“other focus / self neglect”,“hiding self neglect emotion”, “family of origin issues”,“medical problems”)than females. 2.Gender differences on love attitude. Males had significantly higherscores on several love attitude scales(viz.,“eros love”,“ludus love”, and“agape love”)than females while females had significantly higher scores on other scales(viz.,“storge love”, “pragma love”)than males. 3.Three canonical correlations between college students' codependency and their love attitude were conducted and the following results were obtained: (1)When college students had more codependency, they hadhigher“mania love” and“agape love”. (2)When college students had more“other focus / self neglect”, less“hiding self neglect emotion”, they hadhigher“eros love”,“pragma love”and “agape love”,less“ludus love”. (3)When college students had more“hiding self neglect emotion”and “family of origin issues”, they hadhigher“ludus love”, less“mania love”. 4.Results indicated that there were gender difference between college students' codependency and their love attitude. (1)When male college students had more codependency, they hadhigher“mania love”and“ludus love”.On the other hand, when female college students had more codependency, they hadhigher“mania love”and“agape love”. (2)When male college students had more“other focus / self neglect”, less “family of origin issues”, they hadhigher“eros love”,“storge love”, “agape love”and“mania love”,less“ludus love”. (3)When male college students had more“other focus / self neglect”, less “low self worth”and“hiding self neglect emotion”, they hadhigher “eros love”,“pragma love”, and“ludus love”. (4)When female college students had more“other focus / self neglect”, less “hiding self neglect emotion”, they hadhigher“eros love”,“storge love”,“pragma love”and“agape love”,less“ludus love”. Finally, the implications of this study of guidance to establish love relationships were discussed and future research directions were proposed.