透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.238.57.9
  • 學位論文

從社會正義論國家管制運動員違規用藥之教育蘊義

The Discussion on Education Target for National Control and Regulation of Athlete Doping from Point of View of Social Justice

指導教授 : 程瑞福
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


從社會正義論國家管制運動員違規用藥之教育蘊義 中華民國九十七年六月 研 究 生:洪義筌 指導教授:程瑞福 摘 要 本研究從社會正義此政治哲學的立論及觀點出發,探討國家管制運動員違規用藥的目的是否妥切及其管制下所蘊涵之教育意義。主要目的如下:一、了解國家管制運動員違規用藥的論述;二、探究社會正義的意義、源起,配合歷來主要思想家對於社會正義的主張,析述社會正義的面向;三、評述國際奧會、運動員與國家三者對管制違規用藥觀點內外在問題與限制;四、分析社會正義理念如何一一剖示,國家管制運動員違規用藥之理據及瑕疵;五、尋繹所論對於台灣運動員違規用藥教育之啟示。據此,本研究採取分析的教育哲學研究法,試圖從?同的社會正義??中延伸,檢視在?同的主義之下,政府如何管制「運動員違規用藥」及其背後的教育與哲學蘊涵。綜合上述目的,本研究所獲致的主要結論如下:一、國家管制運動員違規用藥的思維多變,但不脫「功利主義」、「自由主義」與「社群主義」的論述;二、國家管制應重視運動員個體「自我決定權?」及「自由意志」;三、國家管制運動員違規用藥應採取「軟式的管制」;四、教育應作為國家管制運動員違規用藥社會正義之第一道防線。 關鍵詞:運動員違規用藥、運動禁藥、社會正義、教育蘊義

並列摘要


The Discussion on Education Target for National Control and Regulation of Athlete Doping from Point of View of Social Justice June,2008 Hung, Yi-Chuan Advisor: Chen, Jui-Fu, Ph.D Abstract This research is based on social justice, its unique political philosophy and viewpoint. It mainly discusses the educational target for national authorities’ goals of combating doping among athletes. Additionally, the relative proper regulation and control are examined for the realization. Those main goals are as follows: (1) national regulation against athlete doping has to be understood; (2) the origin and meaning of social justice should be studied in accordance with mainstream philosophers’ theories for further analysis; (3)the joint responses between International Olympic Committee, athletes and nations are evaluated towards relative questions and limitations to combat doping in sport; (4) the analysis of social justice is demonstrated to show the output and defect of doping control by public authorities; (5) the lessons of Taiwan athlete doping have to be explained for further inspiration of the education. Accordingly, this research takes the philosophy of education as the target analysis method and attempts to expand from different theories about social justice. Under different political ideologies, the control of "Athlete Doping Abuse" and its dynamic meaning of educational philosophy are studied in this research. For the above, the conclusion of this study shows as follows:(1) the intentions towards the abuse of doping can be changeable and described by the theories of "Utilitarianism", "Liberalism" and " Communitarianism"; (2) national control and regulation should take care of "self-decision right" and "the free will" among athletes; (3) national regulation should be applicable to "soft control" against doping abuse in sport; (4) the education should be used as the first line of defense for social justice to combat doping among athletes. Key word: athlete doping, anti-doping movement, social justice, education target

參考文獻


曾仰如(1989)。亞里斯多德。台北:東大。
江宜樺(1998)。自由主義、民族主義與國家認同。台北:揚智文化。
黃 藿(1996)。理性、德行與幸福:亞里斯多德倫理學研究。台北:臺灣學生書局。
王俊權(2001)。權利的倫理學分析及其教育涵義。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。
陳春蓮(1999)。教育公平與教育均等。國立臺灣體育學院學報,4,421-434。

延伸閱讀