透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.137.185.180
  • 學位論文

警方抗議處理對街頭運動暴力變化的影響

The Impact of the Police’s Treatment on the Violent Alteration of the Street Protests

指導教授 : 陳韻如
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


在研究街頭運動時,暴力是經常被討論的議題,街頭運動暴力如何轉變與因何轉變,是本研究所關注的問題。本研究以臺視新聞報導為資料來源,從中搜尋與街頭運動相關報導,收集了解嚴至2006年底,727個街頭抗爭事件作為分析對象。 研究發現,有人受傷、燒毀車輛等重度暴力事件的百分比雖然的確減少了,但是肢體推擠、丟擲雞蛋等輕度暴力事件出現的百分比卻有增加的趨勢,顯示國內的街頭運動中,至今還是有很多輕度的暴力事件存在。本文從警方抗議處理方式來解釋這樣的轉變趨勢,認為多數街頭運動的暴力行為是警方與群眾不良互動的結果,警方嚴厲的處理方式會增加街頭運動中暴力與衝突的機會,而當國家不再強力鎮壓抗議群眾時,出現暴力事件的機會則將減少。因此,隨著政治民主化,雖然嚴厲的抗議處理方式不再普遍被警方採用,但是相對於大型抗議活動,警察面對人數較少或無組織的抗議群眾,卻仍傾向採用嚴厲的處理方式。尤其,總統民選後,偏中小型、較無適當組織與規劃的抗議事件,其出現的比例增加,因此,在民選總統後的街頭運動中,輕度暴力事件仍不斷湧現。

並列摘要


The violence is the issued most discussed in the studies of the street protests; therefore, this study focuses on how and why the violence of the street protests is transferred. The study employs the data source of the TTV news and searches for the relevant reports and stories relating to the protests, including 727 events from end of martial law to 2006 as the subjects. The findings indicate that the percentage of the severe violence like injured persons and burned vehicles is reduced whereas that of the mild violence like corporal pushing and eggs throwing is higher. The preceding result demonstrates that there are still many mild violent incidents in the current protests. This study explains the trend via the police’s treatment against protests and indicates that most violence results from the bad interaction between the protesters and the police. The severe treatment increases the level of the conflict and violence in the street protests; accordingly, the opportunity of the violent incidents is reduced when the state stops suppressing the protesting mass. Therefore, following the political democratization, the police agency tends to avoid the severe treatment against the protesting mass; nevertheless, the protesting incidents with few persons or unorganized protesters still remain suppressed with the severe treatment by the police, especially the small and middle protest incidents without proper organization increase after the presidential election in 1996. Consequently, the mild violent incidents keep occurring in the street protests after the presidential election. in 1996.

參考文獻


洪貞玲,2006,〈誰的媒體?誰的言論自由?-解嚴後近用媒介權的發展〉,《臺灣民主季刊》3(4):1-36。
羅致政,2005,〈2000年政黨輪替後的臺灣政治〉。《臺灣民主季刊》2(1):167-75。
司法院院字第2111號解釋
司法院院字第2025號解釋
唐文慧,1999,〈國家、婦女運動與婦女福利:一九四九年後的臺灣經驗〉。《社會政策與社會工作學刊》3(2):143-179。

被引用紀錄


吳思遠(2012)。公共利益作為集會遊行權利限制基礎之可行性〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0806201217393500
鄭婉婷(2013)。社會運動的媒體呈現〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1702201301571000

延伸閱讀