透過您的圖書館登入
IP:100.26.35.111
  • 學位論文

打造創意街區/文化導向的都市再生? -以迪化街的都市再生前進基地為例-

Developing a Creative District / the Culture-Led Urban Regeneration? - A Case Study of Dihua Street’s ‘Urban Regeneration Station’-

指導教授 : 林文一
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


目前在台北,不論是市政府單位或是都市再生主管局處單位,在推動台北都市再生或再發展策略時,創意城市論述都在其中扮演關鍵的角色。公部門企圖幫助台北成為「創意城市」爭取國際的曝光率,提高競爭力。台北都市更新處提出一套新的都市治理概念:軟都市主義、都市針灸術,以都市再生前進基地 (Urban Regeneration Station,以下簡稱URS)為主要行動計畫,企圖透過結合文化、藝術元素等軟性策略,借助民間之力量,以所謂的創意網絡進行舊城區-迪化街區的街區再生與文化活化。然而,此文化與創意導向之都市治理,是否隱藏都市企業主義的意識形態,進而衍生出如西方文獻對於企業主義或創意城市論述影響下之都市再生,所指出之負面影響:文化成為行銷的工具、仕紳化的危機,此乃本論文企圖討論的。 針對受文化與創意導向都市再生概念的影響,公部門所推動的都市再生實踐,本研究第一個問題主要為了解台北都市更新處如何利用受創意城市論述啟發的URS計畫,去進行近期迪化街區的再生或活化;第二為URS計畫實踐於迪化街區時,公部門所謂的創意網絡是如何帶動迪化街區保存後的發展;第三為URS計畫其具體實踐及建構創意網絡的過程,對於迪化街在地社區、產業等方面產生什麼樣的影響。 本研究以質性方法對個案進行深入研究。透過文本分析、田野調查、深度訪談等實際參與的情形。研究發現如下:一、公部門企圖透過結合創意城市論述之策略(URS)作為推動迪化街區再生之新途徑,然而,此策略卻衍生新的議題,且並未真正回應街區存在的根本問題:人口流失及產業流失造成的社區發展危機。二、公部門在迪化街區宣稱所謂創意網絡帶來的活化成效,其實可能為一種表象。透過對個案的了解,此治理網絡實際上缺乏溝通的機制,甚至引起文化鬥爭的問題:誰的文化能夠代表迪化街區?此網絡關係的斷裂狀態,將難以達成URS其企圖整合在地願景等目標。三、總結本研究對案例之了解,URS其實為「由上而下」的都市再生策略,公部門的軟都市主義,實際上簡化了創意城市之論述,是一種「最硬的軟都市主義」,其隱含的都市企業主義意識形態,忽略社區傳統產業發展的需求,更造成迪化街區產生權力不均衡等負面之影響。

並列摘要


Currently, not only in units of Taipei city government but also in principal organs of urban regeneration adopt Creative City discourse. This discourse plays an important role in improvement of regeneration or redevelopment strategies of Taipei. The public sector attempts to help Taipei become a "creative city" for international exposure and improve its global competitiveness. A new concept of urban governance is proposed for main action plan by Taipei City Urban Regeneration Office: Soft Urbanism and Urban Acupuncture. Dihua Street can be an example for being improved and regenerated by soft strategies. Namely, the plan tries to combine with cultural, artistic elements, as well as the Creative network (the network of URS) which formed by public and private sector. However, it is still no clear answer for ideology of this cultural and creative-led urban governance. Will this ideology of urban entrepreneurialism could really generate the negative impact as the Western literature noted is also discussed in this paper. According to the public sector adopt the generation strategies combined Creative City discourse for improvement and generation of the Dihua Street, the first question in this study is to understand how does Taipei City Urban Regeneration Office use URS plan which inspired by Creative City discourse to regenerate or revitalize Dihua Street recently? Secondly, when URS plan practiced in Dihua Street, how do the creative network promote development of Dihua Street after the historic preservation? Thirdly, what kinds of impact do URS plan and the creative network cause in the local community and industry of the Dihua Street? In this study, I use qualitative methods to carry out case study. Through text analysis, field surveys, depth interviews and own experience by actually involved in the case. Findings are as follows: Firstly, The public sector attempts to use a combination of Creative City discourse strategy (URS) for promoting the regeneration of Dihua Street. However, URS causes new issues and do not solve the basic problem: the development crisis of community of Dihua Street caused by the loss of population and industry. Secondly, public sector declared the creative networks in Dihua Street has succeeded. However, it could be a representation. The network of governance lack institutions of communication, and even caused cultural struggle problems. The network is a fractural network. URS attempts to integrate visions of community and its other targets are also difficult to reach. Thirdly, based on the study of research, it can be concluded that URS is actually a "top-down" strategy of urban regeneration. The public sector actually simplifies the concept of Creative City, so I think “soft urbanism” is "the hardest" one. It implies ideology of urban entrepreneurialism. The ideology cause URS plan ignores the needs of the community development of traditional industries and generates the uneven geographies of power and other negative impacts on Dihua Street.

參考文獻


28.吳光庭(2012)。都市文化遺產保存與地區再生的對話--以臺北市迪化街一段「127公店」為例。博物館學季刊,26:1,頁7-17。
45.張又文(2011)新節慶的誕生-年貨大街,文化研究月報,121,頁2-21。
29.林崇傑(2008)。台灣運用容積移轉於歷史保存之政策與實踐之檢討。文資學報,4,頁 27 -92。
42.藍逸之、李承嘉(2009)臺北市企業型都市治理在空間政治角力過程中的制度危機-一個尺度的政治經濟分析,建築與規劃學報,10(2),頁123-146。
46.黃孫權、成露茜(2007)文化產業、文化治理與地方認同-以台灣新興的嘉年華為例,城市與設計學報, 2(18),頁 23-35.

被引用紀錄


張舒蓉(2016)。臺北市創意街區之街道空間形式與使用行為之研究-以粉樂町創意街區為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840%2fcycu201600883

延伸閱讀