透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.217.194.39
  • 學位論文

我國農民對農地功能與價值認知研究-鄉村類型化差異比較

Taiwan's farmer attitude toward farmland use values and functions - Comparing on rural typology

指導教授 : 李承嘉
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


第二次大戰後,生產論為主的農業體制,一直將農地定位為提供 糧食衣物的角色。但隨著全球政治與經濟環境的改變,後生產論與農 業多功能性逐漸成為農業政策的新典範,將農地的功能與價值不在侷 限在提供糧食衣物的單一生產功能上,更重視農地具備生態功能與生 活功能等多元價值。國外已有許多研究指出人對農地功能與價值認知 已走向多元功能,但台灣至今仍缺乏探討。 因此,本文將透過李克特態度量表,實際調查我國農民對農地功 能與價值的認知,並進行鄉村類型化差異比較,進一步了解不同鄉村 類型的農民是否具有不同的農地功能與價值認知及其差異情況為何。 研究結果發現,農民認為農地不但具有生產功能,並同時兼具生活與 生態功能,顯示我國農民的功能與價值認知符合後生產論與農業多功 能性思潮。此外,不同鄉村類型的農民對農地功能與價值確實具有不 同認知,凸顯本文所提出的台灣鄉村類型化構想有其實益,值得未來 進行農地政策調整之發想基礎。

並列摘要


After the World War Two, farmland is always defined as the supplier of food from Productivism. However, as the change of global politics and economic environment, Post-productivism and Multifunctionality have been becoming the new agricultural paradigms or regimes. Both of them think farmland is very important as their ecological and consumer land use. There are many research pointing out that the function of farmland are more close to Multifunctionality, but there is still lack of such research in Taiwan. Therefore, we conduct a questionnaire research drawing on Likert scale to understand Taiwan’s farmer attitude toward farmland use values and functions. The research finds that farmers accept that farmland are not only product function but also important in life and ecological function. It shows that Post-productivism and Multifunctionality accepted by Taiwan’s farmers.

參考文獻


藍逸之 (2006) 城鄉發展或是農業發展的鄉村?--由台灣城鄉特性初探國土計劃法下鄉村區的調整方向.,土地問題研究季刊,第五卷第二期:30-41
Abler D. (2005) Multifunctionality, land use and agricultural policy. Land Use Problems and Conflicts. Stephan J. Goetz, James S. Shortle, John C. Berstrom(ed).
Clare Hall, Alistair McVittie, Dominic Moran (2004) What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside? A review of evidence and methods. Journal of Rural Studies (20),211–225
Hubert Wiggering, Claus Dalchow, Michael Glemnitz, Katharina Helming, Klaus Mu¨ller, Alfred Schultz , Ulrich Stachow, Peter Zander (2006) Indicators for multifunctional land use—Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape
potentials Ecological Indicators (6), 238–249

被引用紀錄


廖憶華(2014)。日本與台灣農業環境政策之比較研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2014.00482
莊承翰(2013)。農村再生遊憩價值與維護價值之研究─以無米樂社區為例〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2013.00087
楊文璽(2011)。「小地主大佃農」以福建漳浦縣赤湖鎮為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.10965
陳惠玲(2010)。應用空間統計探討農業用地變遷與影響因素-以桃園縣為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0108201013433000
洪偉喆(2011)。都市計畫範圍內農業區多功能之研究-以關渡平原農業區為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0308201100552900

延伸閱讀