重估我國重分配政策之作為,對減緩「分配不均」之效果,是個相當重要的研究議題。從經濟思想史圖近來回顧此議題,想必會產生不同於實證研究的視野與觀點。本文的研究架構乃是從「各大思想家分配命題」開始,並以討論中所衍伸的四個「分配原則」作為分析指標,再以此來對該議題進行研究與分析。本文章節配置如 下: 第二章「政府在賦稅與補貼之作為」、第三章「分配理論與原則」、第四章「我國財 富與重分配政策之評析」,以及第五章「結論」。 這個架構安排乃是先從第二章以賦稅與補貼政策為開始,接著於第三章以各大思想家對於「合宜性」的分配,提出政府重分配政策如何減緩「分配不均」的看法,並建立原則,以此來分析我國重分配政策之效果如何。本者試圖藉由上述的研究步驟,來推論我國目前「分配不均」的發生,是否政府對於「所得」與「財富」的重分 配政策之作為不同,有著正相關性。
Revaluation of redistribution as a policy, the effect of slowing the "unequal distribution" is a very important research topic . From the History of Economic Thought ways to review this issue, presumably will produce different from empirical research horizons and perspectives . Research framework of this paper by the "Major thinkers distribution proposition" to start, and to discuss as an extension of the "four distribution principle" as an analytical indicator, then in order to carry out research and analysis on the subject. This article section is configured as follows: Chapter II "government tax and subsidy of as" , Chapter III "distribution theory and principles", Chapter IV "Evaluation of wealth and redistribution policies," and Chapter V "Conclusion". This framework is based on Chapter II as a starting point for taxes and subsidies. then in the chapter III by the Major thinkers for distribution "propriety" of the proposed government redistribution policy contribute to mitigate, "inequality" of views, and to establish the principle, in order to analyze how the effect of redistribution policies.