透過您的圖書館登入
IP:13.59.136.170
  • 學位論文

資訊透明度與裁決性應計數間之關聯性研究

The Relationship between Information Transparency and Discretionary Accruals

指導教授 : 薛敏正
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


隨著國內外的大型企業接連爆發重大舞弊事件後,資訊透明度的議題逐漸受到高度關注。2003年財團法人證券暨期貨市場發展基金會建置「資訊揭露評鑑系統」進行上市櫃公司資訊揭露透明度之評鑑,目的為提升公司資訊揭露之透明度。過去文獻指出,資訊揭露評鑑系統實施後,管理當局的盈餘管理行為明顯降低。2008年雷曼兄弟風暴事件後,各國紛紛制定更為嚴謹的金融改革法案,其中包含資訊應適當並清楚地揭露。本研究主旨在探討資訊透明度與裁決性應計數間之關聯,尤其是驗證在2008年後,資訊透明度與裁決性應計數間之關聯性是否呈現不同的結果。實證結果顯示,資訊透明度較高的企業,裁決性應計數較低;且在2008年後資訊透明度與裁決性應計數間之相關性,呈現與2008年之前資訊透明度與裁決性應計數間之相關性不同的結果。

並列摘要


Information transparency has attracting numerous attentions from general public since series outbreak of major fraud events involving many large domestic and foreign companies. The "Information Disclosure and Transparence Ranking System" established by the Securities and Futures Market Development Foundation in 2003 is aiming to enhance the transparency of information disclosure for companies listed in national stock exchanges. Previous studies have shown that the probability of management earnings manipulation has significantly reduced after the implementation of information disclosure evaluation system. Countries around the world have developed more rigorous financial reform bills to require information to be much more properly and clearly disclosed, especially after Lehman Brothers bankruptcy case in 2008. This study aims to examine the correlation between information transparency and discretionary accruals and to verify if the results are different before and after 2008. The empirical evidences have shown that disclosure ranking are negative correlative with the discretionary accruals. The evidences also show that the correlation between information transparency and discretionary accruals have different results before and after 2008.

參考文獻


王蘭芬、薛敏正與曾乾豪,2011,資訊透明度的更動與盈餘管理間之關聯,會計審計論叢,第1卷第1期:101-131。
林有志與曾乾豪,2007,財務透明度對盈餘資訊性之影響,當代會計,第8卷第二期:155-180。
莊蕎安,2009,金融危機-錯在會計,會計研究月刊,第276期:52-57。
張瑞當、方俊儒與曾玉琦,2007,核心代理問題與盈餘管理:董事會結構與外部監督機制之探討,管理學報,第24 卷第1 期:17-39。
張瑞當與方俊儒,2006,資訊揭露評鑑系統對企業盈餘管理行為之影響,會計評論,第42期:1-22。

延伸閱讀