透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.12.162.179
  • 學位論文

必要的張力:社會學的知識生產策略

The Essential tension: Strategy in Sociological Knowledge Production

指導教授 : 郭文般
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


研究問題的選擇,通常關乎學科知識發展的模式與方向,而科學家問題的選擇又與其所處的社群位置與知識體系的內在結構密切相關。然而,這兩個因素又如何表現在台灣社會學知識生產的過程中?為了回答此問題,本文以台灣社會學者的名單為基礎,收集1998年至2014年TSSCI與THCI的期刊論文資料,藉此測量各社會學家本土知識生產的策略趨向。研究結果顯示,相對於自然科學,由於社會學多元、獨立、競爭的知識結構,使得發散性思維的知識生產策略相當普遍。而其生產過程也未如自然科學般,會因社群位置的優勢而帶來更多元、發散的策略選擇。不過,「量化研究」卻會因其近似常態科學的研究邏輯,更傾向收斂式的知識累積與整合。最後,社會學有其不同於常態科學的「投資──報酬」邏輯。如果社會學者在知識上達成一定的整合與收斂,反而將有益於在鬆散的知識結構中形成「範例」,提高學者的學術影響力。本文的發現將有助於學術社群重新檢視台灣社會學知識生產的特性及其可能伴隨的優勢與劣勢。

並列摘要


How to choice the research questions is usually associated with the mode and the developmental direction of discipline knowledge. For scientists, these selections are also closely related to their social position in the scientific community. All of them are linked to the internal structure of knowledge system. We wonder how would these factors have an effect in the process of Sociological knowledge production in Taiwan. In order to answer this question, we collect Taiwanese sociologists’ journal articles which were published in the period from 1998 to 2014 in TSSCI and THCI to measure the strategic trend of sociological knowledge production. Contrary to natural science, the results shows that the knowledge structures of sociology are more diverse, independent and competitive. The divergent strategies of knowledge production are quite universal. Besides, sociological knowledge production in Taiwan would not count on the advantaged position in communities to bring more diverse and divergent strategy choices. However, "quantitative methodology" is familiar with normal scientific research logic, thus it tends to be more convergent on knowledge accumulation and integration. Finally, sociology is not the same as “return on investment” in normal science. If sociologists achieve a certain integration and convergence of knowledge, it would be the benefit of produce "example" in a loose knowledge structure, and that would improve the academic influence of scholars. The contribution of this article will be helpful to the academic community to review the characteristics in sociological knowledge production and pros and cons.

參考文獻


章英華,2000,〈學術出版, 評審與學術發展: 一個社會學家的參與觀察〉。《台灣社會學刊》23: 2-23。
蘇國賢,2004,〈社會學知識的社會生產: 台灣社會學者的隱形學群〉。《台灣社會學》8: 133-192。
葉啟政,2001,〈均值人與離散人的觀念巴貝塔: 統計社會學的兩個概念基石〉。《台灣社會學》1: 1-63。
黃樹仁,2007,〈小國的學術困境: 臺灣社會科學研究, 教學與評量的反省〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》65: 117-180。
柯佩均、熊瑞梅、盧科位,2012,〈台灣社會學門專業期刊間引用網絡之結構分析〉。《教育資料與圖書館學》49(4): 533-561。

延伸閱讀