我國刑事訴訟法於92年改採「改良式當事人進行主義」而有大幅度的修正及增訂,其中,以刑訴法第159條明文採行傳聞法則以及傳聞例外之增訂為本次修法的重點之一。然而,刑事訴訟法159條以下關於傳聞法則之相關規定在修訂後,不論就是否應採行傳聞法則到相關傳聞例外條文規定之疏漏,均引發了學界極多的討論及批判。 本文以92年修法所增訂的傳聞例外之一—刑訴法第159條之5「傳聞證據證據能力之同意」為論文核心,先就學說上對於「傳聞同意」之理論基礎、性質、明示同意及擬制同意相關要件之討論做說明,再透過蒐集93年1月1日以後至100年3月31日止的最高法院判決,以分析傳聞同意在我國實務運作之情形,試著找出最高法院對於相關爭議問題所採行之立場或是見解為何,並提出個人對於「傳聞證據證據能力之同意」相關問題之建議。
This country began using the Refined Adversary System in its litigation system in 2003 and the adoption of the Hearsay Rule is the most important part.However,the Hearsay Rule and hearsay exceptions led to plenty of academic discussion and criticism. This writings will elaborate the definition and elements of Admissibility of Hearsay Admitted by Party-Opponent,then introduce opinions of our court and analyze it in order to understand the Practice of the Admissibility of Hearsay Admitted by Party-Opponent in our country.Finally,I will made some comments on the Admissibility of Hearsay Admitted by Party-Opponent.