歷史空間描述一地方歷史變遷、文化發展、社會演進、甚至政治意味的象徵,歷史空間更代表著地方紋理的意涵,歷史空間保存已成為刻不容緩的動作。隨著台灣在經濟與社會快速的發展下,歷史空間保存成為大眾所質疑的議題,民間對於歷史空間保存意識與觀念不足,無法有效發揮其監督上位之功能,而在政府機關主導歷史空間保存政策與制度,造成政府政治權力控制歷史空間的發展,而經營管理更受於財團企業化之經營,歷史空間變成私密的封閉空間,造成過於商品化下的歷史空間喪失其本身之價值。 本研究針對齊東街日式宿舍,為日據時代建設日式宿舍,文化局當前正著手日式宿舍規劃,區中具有兩處指定古蹟與十處登錄歷史建築,在案例中,由歷史空間保存的分析,檢視歷史空間公共性的缺乏,並藉以國民信託的模式,提升市民對於歷史空間保存意識,開啟保存與歷史空間由『私利』轉『公利』的方法,則以國民信託的經營運作,結合地方居民與社區的共生關係,勢將歷史空間轉型發展為都市空間中具有公眾利益的消費空間,最後並提出實質空間規劃。 在公家單位、地方居民、日式宿舍與文化資產法彼此之間保存關係的互動中,欠缺建構公共領域的發展,『國民信託』成為一種建構公共領域的方法。國民信託就是國家/市場/公共/私人領域四分法中的市民社會,國民信託介於國家與市民之間的社會關係,提供國家與市民之間的理性溝通平台。國民信託集合私人領域,將個人追求的利益相互串連將個人私利轉型成為大眾利益,就是文化遺產的文化價值。因此,國民信託便是同等價值於市民社會,國民信託的發展便是建構公共領域的方法,即為市民社會的實踐過程。
A historical space describes the historical changes, cultural development, social progress, and even political meaning of a place. It also presents local textures. Therefore, preservation of historical spaces has become an action that should be taken with no hesitation. With the rapid economic and social development in Taiwan, preservation of historical spaces is an issue questioned by the general public. The civil society has insufficient awareness and concept about preservation of historical spaces, so it cannot effectively function as a supervisor. Besides, as most related policies and systems are dominated by the government, development of historical spaces is controlled by political power. Management of historical spaces is also subject to corporate management styles, so historical spaces have become private and enclosed. Excessive commoditization by corporate management may also overshadow the original value of historical spaces. This study focused on Japanese residence in Chitung Street. These are Japanese style houses built during Japanese Occupation. The Department of Cultural Affairs is currently working on plans of these Japanese houses. In this area, there are two designated historical buildings and ten registered historical buildings. In this study, through an analysis of preservation of historical spaces, the lack of publicity of these buildings was examined. Besides, through the model of National Trust, citizens’ awareness of historical space preservation could be enhanced, and the method of transforming preservation of historical spaces from a “private interest” to a “public interest” was employed. Based on the model of National Trust, the co-living relationship between local citizens and communities was integrated to transform these historical spaces into a consumption space involving public interests in the urban space. Finally, substantial space planning was also proposed. In the interactions among public institutions, local citizens, Japanese residence, and the Cultural Heritage Preservation Law, development of a public sphere was absent. Thus, “National Trust” has become a method to construct a public sphere. National Trust is a civil society comprising the nation, the market, the public area, and the private area. It is a social relationship between the nation and citizens that can serve as a platform for both sides to have rational communications. It connects numerous private interests to form a public interest, and this is the cultural value of historical heritage. Therefore, the value of National Trust is equivalent to that of a civil society, and the development of National Trust is to construct a public sphere, i.e. an implementation of the civil society.