透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.19.56.45
  • 學位論文

土地徵收市價補償查估之研究

Research on Valuation of Land Expropriation Compensation

指導教授 : 游適銘 陳國華
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


國家依法徵收私有土地,係對人民財產權的侵害,應符合特定要件始得為之,其中一項即為給予合理之補償。因過往的徵收補償係以公告土地現值為補償依據,縱算加成補償後,依然與市場價格有所差距,對被徵收人之權益顯不公平。有鑑於此,我國於101修正土地徵收條例,將徵收補償的補償基準改為市價補償。 然一個新制度的提出,是需要審慎檢視其內涵,況市價補償攸關人民權益重大,而影響市價補償最顯著的因素則屬查估制度。查估制度的規範,將連帶影響補償金額的終局結果,可謂市價補償最根本的要點。 因此本研究將針對新修法的市價補償查估制度加以探討,透過問卷訪談方式,希望借重實務工作者的實際經驗,瞭解現行制度操作現況與問題,並詢問相關修正建議。再運用101年至102年台北市、新北市、高雄市三大都會區的宗地補償查估之市價共計3217筆資料,以查估市價相較於公告現值加成之比值為應變數,採複迴歸統計的實證分析,發現推估比準地實例數、委託估價師查估及召開地評會次數等將使市價查估相對提高;反之,比準地個數、實例與比準地位於同一地價情形數、部分徵收及已公告徵收將使市價查估相對降低。

並列摘要


Government expropriation of private land is in accordance with law, but it might violates people’s property rights if not comply with certain requirements; one of them is paying reasonable compensation. Due to past compensation based on Announced Current Land Value, even has additional compensation, it still have a gap between market value. And that is not fair to landowners. In view of this, we amend the Land Expropriation Act, which makes land expropriation compensation should based on market value. Nevertheless, a new institution should review its content. Moreover, it is very important to people’s rights, especially the appraisal of market value compensation, because it may affect the final outcome. Therefore, this study will focus on the appraisal mechanism of market value compensation. Through the questionnaire interviews, this study hopes to draw on the practical experience from practitioners to understand the operating conditions and problems of current institution, and to inquire relevant improving advices. And then, with the use of 3,217 data from Taipei City, New Taipei City and Kaohsiung, this study takes the ratio of market value to the Announced Current Land Value and its additional portion as dependent variables. We find that the numbers of comparables for the benchmark land, commission an appraiser or not, convene land value review committee more than one time will make the dependent variable increase. To the contrary, the numbers of benchmark land, the numbers of comparables within the same land value district, partial takings and whether the expropriation has been announced will make the dependent variable relative decrease.

參考文獻


27.黃宗樂,1991,「土地徵收補償法上若干問題之研討」,『台大法學叢論』,第21卷,第1期,頁67-103。
38.潘依茹,2011,「土地徵收補償價格之探討」,『土地問題研究季刊』,第10卷,第4期,頁88-100。
37.蔡吉源,2001,「台灣土地課稅制度:問題、影響與改革」,『台灣土地研究』,第3期,頁37-82。
24.張永健,2011,「土地徵收補償之規範標準與實證評估」,『東吳法律學報』,第22卷,第4期,頁27-64。
3.石翌儒,2013,「論我國土地徵收法制之新修正─以徵收補償為中心」,國立中正大學法律學系研究所碩士論文。

被引用紀錄


江俊賢(2016)。土地徵收地價補償查估中比準地選取之研究〔碩士論文,逢甲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6341/fcu.M0115417
江東融(2016)。土地徵收剩餘地個案估價方法之探討〔碩士論文,逢甲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6341/fcu.M0009520
陳貞樺(2016)。我國土地徵收補償市價查估制度變革及執行之研究─以臺南市為例〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614060006

延伸閱讀