透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.163.31
  • 學位論文

外人直接投資決定因素之探討-「熟悉度偏誤」觀點

THE DETERMINANTS OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT (FDI):THE FAMILIAR BIAS VIEW

指導教授 : 林泉源
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


以往對於外人直接投資之研究,多以少數國家或地區為樣本為研究對象,探討經濟因素的影響,但對於直接投資為何在某些投資與被投資國組合中較為集中的現象與成因,則尚未加以探討。本研究參考行為財務之熟悉度偏誤觀點,建構「外人直接投資偏誤指標」並納入政治因素、資訊成本及文化距離等因素,以1993-2003年間占全球投資金額81%前16大投資國與占全球73%之31大被投資國數據,利用縱橫資料迴歸模式透過跨國比較加以實證。研究結果發現,直接投資偏誤除了傳統經濟因素如勞動成本及貿易等因素影響外,亦受到代表資訊成本之地理距離及語言,以及文化距離等因素之影響,而政治上之自由貿易協定因素則並不顯著。其次,受到不同變數納入的影響,也使各投資國之固定效果產生差異。本研究成果除可對現有直接投資研究成果加以補充外,由於本研究之樣本範圍遠大於以往相關研究,也有效提高本項實證結果的可信度和參考價值。

並列摘要


Prior research that analyzed determinants of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) mostly used economic factors as explanatory variables, but FDI which was centralized or dispersed couldn’t be explained by these factors. Furthermore, samples were from few countries or regions. This research designed the “Foreign Direct Investment Bias (FDIB)” index by the Behavioral Finance view “Home Bias”, used the Panel Data Regression Model, employed FTA, geographical distances, language and culture distance as the explanatory variables, and expanded sample countries/regions with data from the top 16 investing countries responsible for 81% of global investing and the top 31 host countries receiving investing 73% of total global investments during the period 1993-2003. Adopting the perspective of international comparison, firstly, this research found that countries’ FDIB mainly considered the information cost of geographical distances, language, and culture distance variables rather than FTA in the full model. The fixed effect of FDIB was also mixed in different models. The results support the direct investment theory and can influence future studies. Secondly, the impacts of the small or large models are different cause the role of destination countries. By the same reason, the FDI impact factor considerations are not the same as portfolio investment.

參考文獻


Axarloglou, K. (2005). What Attracts Foreign Direct Investment Inflows in The United States? International Trade Journal, 19(3), 285-308.
Baharumshah, A. Z. & Thanoon, M. A. (2006). Foreign Capital Flows and Economic Growth in East Asian Countries. China Economic Review, 17(1), 70-83.
Bertaut, C., & Kole L. (2004). What Makes Investors Over or Underweight? Explaining International Appetites for Foreign Equities. International Finance Discussion Papers, 819, Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Bhagwati, J.N. (1978). Anatomy and Consequences of Exchange Control Regimes, 219-221. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
(1994). Free Trade: Old and New Challenges. Economic Journal, 104(423), 231–246.

被引用紀錄


吳雅晴(2011)。國際資本移動對台灣地區進口替代產業競爭力的影響〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2011.00073
劉定坤(2013)。論境外天堂對公司治理的影響—以租稅政策與資訊隱密為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.02631
黎文秀(2011)。台商赴越南投資影響因素之研究〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-1511201110381657

延伸閱讀