透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.130.31
  • 學位論文

穿戴式智慧裝置導入於犯罪現場調查之應用

The Application of Wearable Device with Smart Technology in Crime Scene Investigation.

指導教授 : 黃仕斌 李承龍

摘要


在高智慧而思考縝密的犯罪者犯罪手法日益多變趨勢下,科技智慧的快速發展不僅是為人們生活帶來便利,也應該導入應用於犯罪偵查中,協助案件偵破,並改善人們生活的治安環境。我國許多未破案的刑案及重大冤獄事件中,有些是來自於犯罪現場調查的疏失、科學鑑識與司法制度導致;法庭上講求的是科學證據,更仰賴「會說話的證據」來認定罪犯及量刑。犯罪現場調查為案件偵查的起點與絕對關鍵的步驟,因此為建立有效、高品質的物證資料庫,蒐證作業為警界相當重視的程序。而在現場執行蒐證的階段時會面臨到的挑戰在於,調查人員人力不足,及蒐證工具設備使用上的不便都會成為警務單位在蒐證時的限制,導致難以在最低的時效內完成最周全的蒐證任務。 本研究透過蒐集國際間穿戴式科技之討論及發展情況,配合國內現有犯罪現場勘察的相關規範、研討論文、案例分析等先期研究資料進行整理、分析,接著 針對國內犯罪現場調查現況及過程中面臨到的問題,從傳統的穿戴式蒐證器材開始說明,並進一步介紹穿戴式智慧裝置,例如智慧眼鏡「谷哥眼鏡」(Google Glass)、「智慧手錶」(Galaxy Gear)等產品,整合可與其相配合搭載之技術,如車牌、臉部等生物特徵辨識系統、擴增實境(Augmented Reality, AR)、智能裝置之「應用程式」(Applications, Apps)等相關軟體與技術。透過比較傳統方式與引用新興科技作為輔助的方法能夠為犯罪現場調查程序帶來的效益為何,去評估穿戴式科技的新興應用價值,以提出具有可行性之建議方案,建構起穿戴式科技與新興科技技術在犯罪現場調查中執行面的架構及方法。以期能幫助犯罪現場調查過程更有效率、同時減輕調查人員的心力負擔並提升效能之外,也能建立將新興科技導入於鑑識領域之跨領域研究風氣,協助增進國內刑事鑑識領域的發展與進步,為我國人權保障、司法正義盡一份心力。

並列摘要


Crime scene investigation within limited time is a crucial topic for the police. For subsequent forensic analysis, crime scene reconstruction and other procedures, the evidences collected from the crime scene at the first stage may affect whether one case could be successfully solved as soon as possible. The police must make sure that the procedure of searching and investigating is always efficient, comprehensive, and precise, and the quality of evidence must be strictly required as well. This study will collect information of international wearable technology development, and the relevant norms, research papers, case studies about the crime scene investigation. First, find out the existing core difficulties which the domestic crime scene investigators might face by analyzing the preliminary research data. Then, discuss the traditional wearable equipment, and introduce the new wearable smart technology- Google Glass/ Galaxy Gear as a new kind of equipment to assist crime scene investigation. Furthermore, Google Glass can carry with some techniques such as vehicle identification system, facial, biometric related recognition system, Augmented Reality (AR), applications (Apps), and other software programs to become multi-functional. Last, there would be discussion about the benefits and also limits the new technology could bring when placed in the context of a crime scene, and a conclusion with some recommendations. As a consequence, this study focuses on the introduction of new technology for the modern technology management, and explores how technologies could work on the criminal investigation. This study is expected to propose a feasible and effective method in line with the real needs of crime scene investigation process and eventually to help developing the domestic criminal forensics.

參考文獻


[2] 黃中豪,法庭觀察:法庭拿出什麼證據證明我有罪?-徐自強案法庭觀察紀錄與心得,司法改革雜誌第86期
[1] 蕭逸民,江案揭露的法醫及刑事鑑識弊端-比對本案無罪與有罪判決書之理由,司法改革雜誌第86期
[4] 鍾銘輝,「科技運用在犯罪現場調查之研究」,國立交通大學科技管理所,碩士論文,民國101年6月
[3] 林琪亞,犯罪現場蒐證運用行動和雲端科技之研究,國立交通大學科技管理研究所,碩士論文,民國102年
[1] National Academy of Sciences, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. (2009)

延伸閱讀