透過您的圖書館登入
IP:13.59.36.203
  • 學位論文

從關懷倫理看墮胎議題─ 輔以儒家生命倫理學進路

指導教授 : 李瑞全
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本文是以母胎關係、道德地位與義務之關聯為主要的研究論題,重點在論述與修正關懷倫理所論之母胎關係作為道德義務之考量以提供處理墮胎議題一新的思考方式。 文中首先回顧西方生命倫理學上對於墮胎爭議的三個主要立場─保守主義、自由主義與折衷主義─此三立場因全然視母胎為兩獨立個體,未注意母胎之間的特殊關聯,致爭論之重點落於權利與價值衝突的對立模式,未能給予合理的解決方式。 本文採取並分析諾丁的關懷倫理來探討墮胎議題,因關懷倫理注意到母胎之間的特殊的情感與關係連結,唯個人的道德實踐尚需依賴個人對義務與關係的重視程度,致處理墮胎議題尚存疑難;作者期以儒家生命倫理學之論據,從對胎兒道德地位之釐清與母親仁心之發用兩方面來補足之,最後,並以此論述針對台灣近來一些關於生育政策之制定的反省。

關鍵字

儒家 關懷倫理學 墮胎 母胎關係 諾丁

並列摘要


Abortion is an important and difficult moral issue in bioethics, because it involved the moral dilemma between the pregnant women and fetus. This essay is a discussion of the mother-fetus relation, moral status and obligations. It explicates with critical comments the point of view of care ethics on these notions and tries to take a new approach in the reflection of the abortion issue. In the essay, it starts with a review of the three traditional approaches, namely the conservative, the liberal and the feminist approaches and points out that they all took the mother and the fetus as separate individuals, paying no attention to the special relationship between them, and thus fell into the dead alley of conflicts between human rights and human values. Ethics of Care is a different voice from the traditional three main theories, Noddings’ care ethics is employ because it picks up the special emotions and relationship between the mother and the fetus instead of the rights approach. However, personal moral practice is still dependent on the commitment one takes for one’s obligations and relationship. The solution proposed remains controversial. In this essay, the basic tenets of Confucian bioethics, namely the moral status of the fetus and the mother as a moral agent, and their ethical relationship are introduced to mitigate the dilemma. It proposes a reasonable solution of the dilemma which is extended to an analysis of some of the issues of the new abortion policy of Taiwan.

參考文獻


釋昭慧,2004, 〈揮之不去的父權夢魘─評述「優生保健法」修正案之爭議〉 , 《應用倫理研究通訊》 ,第三十一期,中壢:國立中央大學哲學研究所出版。
張淑美、陳慧姿,2007, 〈尊重生命─由優生保健法第三章第九條論胎兒生命權的抉擇與維護〉 ,《生死學研究》 ,第五期,台北:洪葉文化出版。
陳淑卿,1995, 《墮胎的道德問題研究》 ,國立中央大學哲學研究所碩士論文。
黃偉軫,2004, 《墮胎的道德問題之母胎關係》 ,國立中央大學哲學研究所碩士論文。
蒲菁菁,1997, 《德我肯論墮胎與安樂死》 ,國立中正大學哲學研究所碩士論文。

被引用紀錄


鍾瑞雲(2014)。論我國建構安全棄嬰法制之可行性〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201400146
蔡牧容(2012)。由不當負擔理論檢視我國墮胎法律制度〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.10540
楊季華(2011)。台灣大學生的墮胎知識、態度與健康照護服務需求〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315133459

延伸閱讀