透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.220.137.164
  • 學位論文

「進步」何以是陷阱?––以人類中心主義視角探討

Why the "process" Is a Trap —The Viewpoint of Anthropocentrism

指導教授 : 蕭振邦
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


我這本論文主要的重點在討論人類的進步想法何以變成人類發展的陷阱。從人類中心主義出發,揭示進步想法與人類中心主義之間形成的關係如何造成人類發展的問題。本論文透過Murdy的人類中心主義作為參考系,進而探究「進步陷阱」形成的可能原因,以及反省人類中心主義的理論論述模式,嘗試挖掘環境倫理的深度含意。 本論文之論題為「『進步』何以是陷阱?––以人類中心主義視角探討」,涵蓋了以下重點:(1)「進步」的認識:從歷史線索著手並使用概念形成分析的方式理解「進步」概念;(2) 人類中心主義內涵的釐清:從反人類中心主義、非人類中心主義與修正的人類中心主義的觀點,試圖梳理出人類中心主義理念的梗概;(3)「進步」想法與環境的關係:此處重點在於說明「進步」的陷阱,同時也是本論文核心之處;(4)關於「進步」陷阱的後續討論:檢討人類中心主義進路的「進步」觀,開啟另一種環境倫理視野。

並列摘要


The focus of this thesis is to discuss why “process thinking” becomes a trap of human development. The discourse approach starts from Anthropocentrism. Discussion discloses the relationship between “process thoughts” and “Anthropocentrism”, which causes some human development problems. How the relationship turns into a problem is the work of this thesis. This thesis follows Murdy‟s Anthropocentrism as a framework to investigate the concept of Anthropocentrism and the reason of “process” forming. By reflecting on the discussion mode of Anthropocentrism, this thesis attempts to explore the environmental sense. This thesis deals with four issues. First, in order to recognize “process thoughts”, I use the way of concept formation to realize. Besides, I also make use of analyzing history to understand. Secondly, I clarify the viewpoint of anti-anthropocentrism, non-anthropocentrism and modified anthropocentrism to reveal the main idea of Anthropocentrism. Thirdly, to know the relationship between “process thoughts” and “environment”, I handle the idea of “process” to explain why it is a trap. This issue is the core issue of this thesis. Finally, due to this issue, review and discuss the point of view of Anthropocentrism on “process thoughts” to give a new environmental perspective by interpreting the concept of “prejudices” in Chuang Tzu.

參考文獻


王從恕,2001/09,〈歐美兩地環境倫理發展過程之比較〉,刊於《科學教育》第242期,臺北:國立臺灣師範大學科學教育中心,頁28-35。
盧風,1996,〈主客二分與人類中心主義〉,刊於《鵝湖月刊》第12期,臺北:鵝湖月刊社,頁12-19。
洪蘭(譯),Matt Ridley(著),2004,《天性與教養––先天基因與後天環境的交互作用》(Nature via Nurture: Genes, Experience and What Makes Us Human, 2003),臺北:商周出版,初版五刷。
方志強,2001/06,〈「進步」的理念—二十世紀的挑戰〉,刊於《新史學》第12卷第2期,臺北:新史學雜誌社編輯委員會,頁131-172。
蕭振邦,2000/12,〈大地美學:其議題探究與可能開展〉,刊於李瑞全編,《鵝湖學誌》第25期,臺北:文津,頁99-144。

延伸閱讀