著手之研究-以竊盜罪為探討課題

竊盜犯罪由於是種乘人不知且無強暴脅迫般，破壞他人實力支配的手法，其著手認定在實務上似無一定標準。參照民國82年度第2次刑事庭會議決議（二）內容︰「今後我國在司法審判實務上，對於竊盜罪之著手時點，除應就眾多學說斟酌損益，並參酌各國之立法例及判例演變趨勢，於行為人以行竊之意思接近財物，並進而物色財物，即可認為竊盜行為之著手外，實務上似不妨從個案詳加審認，另創竊盜著手時點之新見解，以期符合現代社會環境之實際需要，始為上策。」有關如何判斷行為之著手的問題，在學界的討論上可說是百家爭鳴。著手判斷的爭議由來已久，在我國文獻上多以外國學說上的見解為說明，亦即形式客觀、實質客觀、主觀以及主客觀混合說等等理論。不可否認，在區別犯罪行為過程的各家理論中，很難用一種統一的標準區別框架把預備與未遂的中間清楚切割。本文在討論著手爭議之處，其與危險性的升高，甚至是對於法益侵害的急迫性，如何去評價都是本文欲處理的要點之一。甚多犯罪類型均有著手的問題，為何本文以竊盜罪為探討課題，在於竊盜罪本身之犯罪型態乃破壞舊持有之實力支配，過程平靜，於外觀上甚難看出其大動作的身體動靜。在實務見解中，普通竊盜的著手認定上常常會將其進入著手時點的行為，定位為接近財物、物色財物和目尋其物。在加重竊盜要件上仍要視其是否完成普通竊盜犯罪之著手。因此本文欲以實務上判決判例整理歸納之認定，來探討竊盜犯罪行為的著手判斷。

關鍵字

著手；竊盜

並列摘要

Theft crime is by people I do not know and no stress like rape, destruction of others strength to dominate the approach, its Zhushou found in practice seems to be no certain standard. Reference to the 2nd to the 1993 annual meeting resolution of the criminal division of the (b) the content of the Made in China in the future practice of the administration of justice, larceny Zhushou point, except on a number of doctrines, where appropriate, profit and loss, and with reference to the countries of the legislation and jurisprudence evolution trends, the perpetrator to steal the meaning close to the property, and thus to identify property, can be considered theft behavior Zhushou practice seems to wish to detail from the case review identified another record theft proceed to the point of new insights in order to meet the the actual needs of the modern social environment, the beginning is the best policy. " In the academic discussion about how to determine the behavior Zhushou, is contending. Begin to judge the long-standing controversy in the literature of our country and many more insights on the foreign doctrine to illustrate the form of an objective that is, the real objective, subjective and objective and subjective mixing said theory. Undeniably, the various theories of the process to distinguish between criminal acts, it is difficult to use a unified framework of the standard difference between preparation and attempt the middle of clear cutting. At discuss Zhushou dispute, the increased risk, even for legal interest against the urgency of how to evaluate one of the points that are in this article wishes to handle. Many crime types have proceed to the question why the larceny discussion of the subject is larceny own forms of crime is to undermine the strength of old held dominated the process of calm in appearance, even difficult to see the big move body movement. Practical views, ordinary theft Zhushou identified often will enter the begin point of the behavior, location close to the property, to identify their personal belongings and head to find its material. Still on the aggravated burglary elements as the its completion ordinary theft crime Zhushou. Therefore, this article trying to use practical judgment jurisprudence summarization finds to investigate the theft crime Zhushou judgment.