臺灣與福建高齡教育實施之比較研究

A comparative research on implement of elder education in the Taiwan and Fukien

林巧韻(Chiao-Yun)

指導教授 ： 黃錦山

國立中正大學/教育學院/成人及繼續教育系高齡者教育研究所/碩士(2012年)

摘要

摘　　要
本研究臺灣與福建高齡教育實施，主要探討機構行政組織、經費來源、課程規劃、學員特性、師資來源與教學型態六大類的實施。研究者以立意取樣，臺灣與福建分別各取五間機構之領導者作為研究對象，以訪談法為主、文件分析法為輔的蒐集研究資料，提出兩地區六大類實施之異同，並給予建議。
本研究的研究目的有五點：（一）探討臺灣與福建高齡教育發展背景與歷程；（二）比較臺灣與福建高齡教育機構的行政組織與經費來源；（三）比較臺灣與福建高齡教育機構的課程規劃與學員特性；（四）比較臺灣與福建高齡教育機構的師資來源與教學型態；（五）研究結果提供臺灣與福建高齡教育機構之參考。
透過資料分析得到結論，摘述如下：（一）行政組織導向：台灣地區朝「機構與學員導向組織混合模式」邁進；福建地區朝更「機構導向組織」發展。（二）行政組織招生方式：台灣地區除「紙本招生」外，也使用口耳相傳、電台、網路；福建地區曾使用報紙刊登廣告做招生，但現在無招生問題。（三）行政組織行銷宣傳：台灣地區最有效的方式為「媒體」；福建地區最有效的方式為「網路」。（四）經費來源：台灣地區不只一種方式，同時存在「政府補助、自行籌款、民間捐助」；福建地區以「政府補助」為主要經費來源。（五）課程規劃：臺灣與福建以「台灣樂齡學習中心課程分析」，課程開課比例都失衡，但兩地區失衡比例不同。（六）學員特性：臺灣與福建大致相同。在學員年齡部分，台灣地區年齡為五十五至七十九歲佔多數；福建地區年齡為五十歲至七十歲佔多數。（七）師資來源：臺灣與福建都有「正式與非正式聘任混合模式」。台灣地區也存在「非正式聘任」；福建地區也存在「正式聘任」。（八）教學型態：臺灣與福建都有「傳統教學取向」；台灣地區也存在「傳統教學及創新教學取向混合模式」。
最後，依研究結論針對台灣地區高齡教育相關單位、對福建地區高齡教育相關單位及對未來研究三方面，分別提出建議。

關鍵字

高齡教育實施 ； 比較研究 ； 臺灣與福建

並列摘要

Abstract
This research is to investigate implement of elder education in Taiwan and Fukien, concerning about six aspects: structures of institutions, source of funding, courses arrangement, students, sources of teachers and teaching style.

The researcher samples each leader of five institutions in the Taiwan and Fukien as the research objects. The study applies the interview method as well as the document analysis, in order to point out six differences between the two area and to provide suggestions.

There are five aims of this study: (1) to investigate developments of elder education in Taiwan and Fukien;(2) to compare institutions and source of funding of elder education in Taiwan and Fukien; (3) to compare courses arrangements and students of elder education in Taiwan and Fukien; (4) to compare sources of teachers and teaching styles of elder education in Taiwan and Fukien; (5) to provide research results for institution of elder education in Taiwan and Fukien.

Through the analysis, the researcher concludes that (1) administrative organization-oriented: Taiwan area intends to be member-driven and institution-driven and the Fukien area prefer be more institution-driven.(2)Enrollment of administrative organizations: Taiwan area uses papers to enroll students as well as word of mouth, radios, and the internet; Fukien area used to enroll students with advertisement on newspaper. (3) Promotion of administrative organizations: the most effective method for promotion is Media in Taiwan; The most effective method to promote themselves is the internet.(4) Source of funding: there is more than one method to have funding for elder education in Taiwan area, such as government subsides, self-raising, and donations; The main sources of funding in Fukien area is government subsides. (5) Courses arrangement: both areas are analyzed with the Active Aging Learning Centers and results show that there is a discrepancy in the courses they offered, but the percentage of discrepancy is different.(6) Students: both areas show similar results. As for ages, the age of those students in Taiwan area is between 55 and 79 years old; Those in Fukien area is between 50 and 70 years old. (7) Sources of teacher: both area show that they employ regular and substitute teachers. (8) Teaching style: both areas tend to apply traditional teaching style; Taiwan area also apply creative teaching methods as well as traditional ones.

At last, the study provides suggestions regarding elder education institutions in Taiwan and Fukien and future study.

並列關鍵字

comparative research ； implement of elder education ； Taiwan and Fukien

參考文獻

黃錦山（2002）。當代教育哲學的新課題：老人教育哲學之探討及其啟示。教育研究集刊，48（3），1-33。

黃富順、楊國德（2011）。高齡學。臺北：五南。

吳明烈、陳雯萍、楊國德（2008）。我國高齡教育的實施與發展。臺灣教育，649，2-10。

Fok, S. y. (2010). The Meaning of the Learning Experiences of Older Adults in Hong Kong. Educational Gerontology, 36(4), 298-311.

Huang, C. S. (2005). The Development of a University for Older Adults in Taiwan: An Interpretive Perspective. Educational Gerontology, 31(7), 503-519.