摘要
本論文旨在探討清代文人在臺灣的居地生活，廓清他們對於所處環境空間之「地方感」（sense of place）的滲入情形。我們知道，人無法離開土地的涵養而獨立生活，不論是外地或本地文人，都曾在這塊土地上進行居住（dwell）、落實生活的一切行為，他們在臺時間的久暫，都不致改變「日常生活」的行為事實，即便他們的感情結構、出身背景、社會關係等呈現著不同型態。本論文嘗試著以單獨而具體的地理空間作為討論對象，企盼深化討論的層次，期盼更能看見「空間」（被）運作的軌跡，進一步理解臺灣地理空間的發展，以及被建構甚至再現的過程。本項研究的架構為：第二章囊括海洋空間、山岳空間兩種不同的空間類型，前者企圖將清人對海洋空間的印象、感受，乃至於理解的過程，透過相關作品，作一系統性的耙梳；因著環境的區隔，成為神祕的存在。文人或凝望或觀想，往往少以親履，因此在實際的地域空間上加諸了多元的想像，透過文字予以再現，在這樣的過程中，彰顯了什麼樣的地方觀點？又，這些觀點是否因為書寫者的身分而有意義上的差異？第三章延續探討清人在理解自然地理空間之後的因應，考察他們如何詮釋空間、經營空間。第四章繼以探究城邑內細部的空間規範及其秩序的置入，瞭解官方如何建構一個能夠彰顯國家風華的空間場域，並且進一步勾勒渡臺官員、幕士等諸員在其建物內部的生活情況。第五章以本土文人為對象，分析其園林空間如何被建構，而至於逐漸凝聚、內化為一個地方的意義中心。第六章則歸納前面各章節的論述結果，並就本項研究的價值進行說明。
並列摘要
This essay aims to explore the life of residence of the Qing dynasty in Taiwan, clearance they penetrate situation for the environment space "sense of place". We know that people unable to leave the conservation of land and to live independently, whether foreign or local literati, both live in the land of residence (dwell), the implementation of all acts of life, they were temporarily in the time table for a long time, and not to change the “daily life” behavior, even their feelings structures, family background, social relations, presents a different type. In this essay, we try to separate and specific geographic space as the object in, hoping to deepen the level of discussion, looking forward to see more "space" (to be) the track of operation, further understanding the development of the Taiwan geography space, and is constructed even the process of reproduction. In this way of thinking under the framework of the present study: the second chapter covers the marine space, the two different type of space in mountains, the former one attempt to Qing Dynasty people’s marine spatial impression, feelings, to understand the process, through related essays as a systematic analysis; Literati were mostly taking looks or meditating but hardly be there by themselves, therefore the actual geographical space had been imposed many imagination and been reproduced through words, in this kind of process, what kind of the point of local view had been highlighted? Or, was there any meaningful difference because of the views of writer's identity?Chapter three continues the previous mountain space, will keep exploring the understanding of the natural geographical space of coping in the Qing Dynasty, and examine how they explain and manage the space.Chapter four follows to explore the the detailed space inside the cities and standardize their order, and to understand the official be able to demonstrate how to construct a country elegance of the space field, and to further outline the life of Taiwan officials and staff through the status of building.Chapter five is focusing on local literati, analysis of the garden space which is constructed as gradually condensed internalized into the center of a place of significance. Chapter six discusses the results of the previous chapters’ summary, and described the value of the study.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 陳龍廷（2003）。相似性、差異性與再現的複製：清代書寫臺灣原住民形象之論述。博物館學季刊，17(3)，91-111。https://doi.org/10.6686/MuseQ.200307_17(3).0009
- 李文良（2003）。清初臺灣方志的“客家”書寫與社會相。臺大歷史學報，(31)，141-168。https://doi.org/10.6253/ntuhistory.2003.31.05
- 劉郡芷（2010）。清代台灣方志中文化資產記載之研究〔碩士論文，國立臺北藝術大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6835/TNUA.2010.00128
- 張育薰（2012）。日治後期臺灣民俗書寫之文化語境研究〔碩士論文，國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2012.00244
- 謝順宏（2020）。臺灣歷史人物傳記數位人文系統設計與建置之研究〔博士論文，國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202001515