本研究乃以雲林縣「九年一貫學校」政策規劃之試辦對象:北港國中與南陽國小、古坑國中與古坑國小做為研究個案,探討該案之政策立意與規劃、決策場域,各利害關係人之立場、互動與對政策之影響。除此之外,研究者亦試圖歸納比較兩合併案之各利害關係人所持之贊成與反對意見,提出政策建議,作為日後進行他校整併之參考。 為達成研究目的與問題,在研究方法上,除了採用傳統靜態研究之「次級資料」蒐集分析之外,並兼採動態研究之質化「深度訪談法」,作為資料蒐集及分析的方法,並以補充靜態研究之不足。 研究發現本政策由縣長扮演主導的關鍵角色,北港案中之利害關係人互動多,且影響力大,影響政策內容為減少行政組織合併、校齡分別繼續計算、國中國小作息分開、家長會要分別獨立;古坑案中雖互動較少,但仍具影響力。整體政策規劃過程在北港案較有爭議且常見衝突,古坑案則較平和且少有爭議。 建議縣府應提出更具說服力之政策立意、進行更即時完善之政策溝通、廣納更多利害關係人之意見,及妥善評估這項政策的推展期。建議日後可再就這項政策正式推行的部分深入探究。
This study focuses on the standpoints and interactions of the policy stakeholders in Nine-year Join School Program which includes two combinations, one is Beigang case and another one is Guken. Researcher summarizes the approvals and disapprovals of every stakeholder in two cases and provides suggestions for further similar cases. For the study purpose and questions, the researcher adopts the methodology of collecting and analyzing secondary data and qualitative methodology of in-depth interview as a supplement to the insufficient of the first one. The research results & implications are presented as follows: 1. Yunlin county magistrate plays a critical role in two combinations of nine-year Join school program. 2. There are many interactions among the stakeholders in Beigang case and their influences on policy making are large, including a. The combinations of the administrative organizations in two cases are minimized. b. The school years of elementary schools and junior high schools are separately counted. c. The timetable of junior high school and elementary are different. d. Elementary school has its own Parent Advisory Council and so does junior high school. 3. Although there are fewer interactions among the stakeholders in Gukeng case than in Beigang, they still do have their influences. 4. In the process of combining, Beigang case has more controversies and conflicts than Gukeng which is more peaceful and less controversial. The research results provide suggestions that Yunlin county government is suppose to bring out more persuasive policy purposes , proceed more update and flawless policy communications, invite and accept the opinions from more stakeholders and well evaluate the schedule of this program. It’s also suggested to do deep studies on the implementation of this nine-year joint school program in the near future.