透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.94.150.98
  • 學位論文

佛教因素對南北朝史學發展之研究--以四部史書為例

A Study on Buddhism Factors to The Development of The North-South Dynasties Historiography--Taking four History Books as An Example.

指導教授 : 雷家驥
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


史學與佛教在魏晉南北朝時期皆有突出的發展與表現,兩者間是否存有內在聯繫,耐人尋味。目前學界在佛教對魏晉南北朝史學之影響的整體研究,己有若干成果;不過,就佛教對於南北朝史學,乃至針對南朝、北朝各自史學發展的影響比較,甚少關注,使得此一學術議題仍有深入探討的空間。 佛教勢張是南北朝時期顯著的時代特色,時代刺激學術,故探討南北朝史學的發展,不能忽略此時期佛教興盛的影響,「佛教--史學--影響」乃為本文核心主軸。需特別說明的是,雖然本文論述的研究對象為廣義的佛教史學撰述,但非專門探討佛教史學;以及兩種文化在接觸、交流後,往往互為影響,然本文並非探求中國史學對佛教的作用,而是站在中國史學史的角度,著重區域空間這項變因,探究南北朝時期,「佛教」對中國「史學」所造成的「影響」,尤其重點聚焦於比較佛教在南朝、北朝發展之異,其是否、如何反映、呼應了史學在南朝、北朝發展之別。一般總將南北朝佛教採用一種總體、印象式的觀察,並沒有將南朝佛教、北朝佛教作為雙重視野來進行各自的考察,遑論將南、北佛教之異進一步應用於探討南、北史學之別。故筆者於本文先論述南朝、北朝佛教發展之不同,然後將此差異觀照南朝、北朝史學發展之差別,梳理佛教與史學兩者間內在脈絡、聯繫。繼而以「舉證」較析的研究方法,從正史和史注學兩種個案類型,分別舉《南齊書》、《魏書》兩部正史,以及《世說新語注》、《洛陽伽藍記》兩部史注著作為例,依南、北地域並置對照,進行具體的比較和分析。 本文主題為「佛教因素對南北朝史學發展之研究--以四部史書為例」,研究結果揭示佛教在南朝、北朝的發展同中有異,儘管此分歧是大原則、大方向的畫分,卻仍有一定程度的參考價值,可以用來概括觀照佛教在南、北地域空間上的差異,進而據以檢視、探究南、北史學發展不同。總言之,南北朝時期,佛教在南、北的差異,頗能一以貫之與南、朝史學的差異相互參照,有所關聯,意即佛教與史學在南、北發展呈現的不同特色,大致互相呼應、吻合。 關鍵字:史學、佛教、南北朝、差異、影響

關鍵字

影響 差異 南北朝 佛教 史學

並列摘要


Historiography and Buddhism both have outstanding development and performancen in the North-South Dynasties , whether there are intrinsic link between the two, it is interesting. At present, about Buddhism have influence on the Wei-Jin Nan-Bei Dynasties historiography, has a number of academic achievements. However, Buddhism for the North-South Dynasties historiography, and even affect the Southern dynasty, Northern dynasty Development for their comparative historiography , it is too little attention. Therefore, there is still an academic space.Buddhism is significant characteristics of the era in the North-South Dynasties, time can stimulate academic, So explore the development of the the North-South historiography, can’t ignore the impact of Buddhism flourished in this period. "Buddhism - History - influence" is the focus of the study spindle. In particular note is that, although the study discussed subjects concerning generalized Buddhism historiography writings, not devoted to Buddhist historiography. Two cultures in contact, communication, it is often affect each other. But, this article is not to explore the role of Buddhism in Chinese historiography, it is from the perspective of Chinese historiography, focusing on the area of space. explore the North-South Dynasties , "Buddhism" have " influence" on Chinese " historiography".In particular, emphasis is focused on comparing the Buddhist differences between the Southern dynasty and the Northern dynasty, whether and how to reflect, echoing the historical differences between the Southern dynasty and the Northern dynasty. In this study, first discusses the Buddhist differences of the North-South Dynasties, then adopt these differences to observe and study historical differences between the Southern dynasty and the Northern. After that, with "proof" research method, learn from two kinds of types-- the official history and the history annotation .Taking four history books as an example:"Southern Qi Shu", "Wei" two official historical books, as well as "Shi note", "Luoyangqielanji" two history annotation books.The study result is Buddhist differences between the Southern dynasty and the Northern dynasty can consistent with historical differences between the Southern dynasty and the Northern. Key words: Historiography, Buddhism , North-South Dynasties, Differences , Influences .

參考文獻


游千慧,〈從學術交涉談六朝史學的形成與延展〉,臺北:臺灣大學中國文學研究所碩士論文,2007年。
卓育如,〈北魏時期漢人士族的學思變遷〉,臺北:臺灣大學中國文學研究所碩士論文,2005年。
逯耀東,〈魏晉志異小說與史學的關係〉,《食貨月刊》(復刊)1982年8月總第十二卷第45期,頁134-156。
古正美,〈北涼佛教與北魏太武帝發展佛教意識形態的歷程〉,《中華佛學學報》第13期,2000年,頁227-266。
曹仕邦,〈太子晃與文成帝--英年早逝的天才父子政治家大力推廣佛教於北魏的功勳及其政治目的〉,《中華佛學學報》1996年7月總第九期,頁99-122。

延伸閱讀