苗栗縣教師休閒參與動機、休閒滿意度 與休閒阻礙因素關係之研究

The Study of teachers' Leisure Participation Motivation, Leisure Satisfaction and Leisure Constraints in Miaoli.

陳東燕(Chen Tung yen)

指導教授 ： 楊欽城

朝陽科技大學/管理學院/休閒事業管理系/碩士(2014年)

摘要

本研究目的在瞭解苗栗縣教師休閒參與動機、休閒滿意度與休閒阻礙因素關係之現況，比較不同背景變項在休閒參與動機、休閒滿意度與休閒阻礙因素上之差異及因素間相關情形。本研究係以苗栗縣教師為研究對象，藉由蒐集相關文獻後並彙整而形成研究架構，並改編「苗栗縣教師休閒參與動機、休閒滿意度與休閒阻礙因素關係調查問卷」為研究之工具，採立意抽樣之方式進行調查，共發放435份問卷，回收有效問卷計407份，有效回收率為94%，利用SPSS for Windows 20.0版統計套裝軟體進行資料處理與分析。
研究結果顯示：一、休閒參與動機共有三個因素，其中以「精神性動機」的得分最高，其次是「社會性動機」，最低分為「健康習慣動機」；休閒滿意度共有四個因素，其中以「新奇性」的滿意度最高，其次為「安全舒適性」與「成就性」，「情緒性」之滿意程度最低；休閒阻礙因素共有二個因素，其中以「場所因素阻礙」的感受程度最高，「個人因素阻礙」之感受程度最低。二、苗栗縣教師休閒參與動機在「性別」、「年齡」、「不同專長」、「每週從事休閒運動之總次數」與「每週從事休閒運動之時數」之個人背景變項上皆達顯著差異；休閒滿意度在「性別」、「年齡」、「不同專長」、「每週從事休閒運動之總次數」與「每週從事休閒運動之時數」之個人背景變項上皆達顯著差異；休閒阻礙因素在「性別」、「不同專長」、「每週從事休閒運動之總次數」與「每週從事休閒運動之時數」之個人背景變項上皆達顯著差異。三、苗栗縣教師在休閒參與動機、休閒滿意度達顯著正相關，休閒阻礙因素與休閒參與動機、休閒滿意度達顯著負相關。

關鍵字

休閒阻礙因素 ； 休閒滿意度 ； 休閒參與動機

並列摘要

The main purposes of this study was to understand the current situation of leisure motivation, leisure satisfaction and leisure constraints of Miaoli County Teachers, and to compare the difference of leisure motivation, leisure satisfaction and leisure constraints from different backgrounds teachers and to explore the interrelationship between those factors. Miaoli County teachers were treated as the subjects in this study, and this study based on the past literatures to form the research framework and adapted "Miaoli County teachers leisure motivation, leisure satisfaction and leisure constraints factors questionnaires" as a tool in this study, purposive sampling method was used to collect questionnaires . A total of 435 questionnaires were evenly distributed. 407 valid questionnaires were returned, with a valid return rate of 94%, the SPSS 20.0 statistical software was used to analyze the valid questionnaires.
The results showed that: First, there are three factors of leisure motivation, the highest score was spiritual motivation, followed by social motivation and healthy habits motivation. There are four factors that leisure satisfaction, the highest score was novelty experience, followed by safety and comfort, achievement, and emotional; the highest level of total leisure constraints was place factors impede, followed by personal factors impede. Secondly, there are significant differences on teachers’ leisure motivation, leisure satisfaction and leisure constraints with different gender, age, different expertise, the total number of weekly engaged in recreational sport, and engaged in recreational sport hours of weekly. Beside the age factor was not significant difference in leisure constraint. Finally, leisure recreation and leisure satisfaction was significantly relationship on leisure constraints in Miaoli County teacher motivation.

並列關鍵字

Leisure constraints ； Leisure satisfaction ； Leisure motivation

參考文獻

Dattilo, J., & Murphy, W. D. (1991). Leisure education program planning: A systematic approach. State College, PA: Venture.

林嵩棧（2007）。推展教師休閒運動之有效策略。學校體育，17(5)，104-108。

吳明隆（2003）。SPSS統計應用學習實務。臺北市：知城數位科技股份有限公司。

許思源、蔡博隆、韓大衛（2006）。新竹科學園區員工休閒運動參與動機、休閒運動阻礙、休閒運動滿意度內涵之分析研究。大專體育學術專刊，247-252。

韓大衛、郭正煜(2002)。籃球運動代表隊參與動機之研究。大專體育學術專刊，154-161。