本論文旨在研究國小六年級學童經過問題解決教學後,在燃燒與防火概念知識、技能及火災防災態度的教學成效,以提供未來教學者在燃燒與防火教學及學校辦理防火教育的參考。研究工具為研究者參考九年一貫教學目標與消防署資料所設計的試卷。研究對象為臺中市國小六年級學童,回收有效樣本共計134份,主要研究結果歸納如下: 一、概念圖中的迷思概念有油類火災誤以為是金屬火災;移除助燃物或移除可燃物誤以為是降低燃點來滅火。 二、以問題解決教學後有87.62%學童已具有燃燒與防火概念知識與技能,而火災防災態度五點量表的平均得分是46.485,具積極且正向的態度,並能了解在進出公共場所時要先觀察安全門梯及逃生路線的重要性。 三、本研究樣本在性別、是否參觀消防單位、是否參加消防單位辦理的活動與是否參加學校辦理的消防演練在燃燒與防火概念知識與技能、火災防災態度上都沒有顯著差異。 四、本研究樣本是否使用網路查閱資料、是否實際參加模擬火災逃生演練及實際操作滅火器具在燃燒與防火概念知識與技能達到非常顯著差異,亦即後測成績在燃燒與防火概念知識與技能非常顯著優於前測成績,但在火災防災態度試卷上未達到顯著差異的結果。
The study aims to investigate the effectiveness of problem solving teaching on the sixth graders’ conceptual cognition of burning and fire prevention, skills and attitude toward fire prevention. The research employed the self-designed questionnaire based on Grade 1-9 Curriculum goals and the data of National Fire Agency. The subjects are the sixth graders in Taichung City. A total of 134 valid samples were recovered. The major findings are summarized as follows. 1. The misconceptions in the concept mapping include mistaking oil fires as metal fires, mistaking removing comburents and combustible materials as reducing ignition so to extinguish fire. 2. After the problem-solving teaching, 87.62% of the subjects are possessed with the cognitive concepts and skills of fire prevention. The average scores on the item of fire prevention attitude are 46.485 on Likert scale. The subjects are found to be spontaneous and positive in preventing fire and they are aware of the importance of identifying the emergency exit and escape routes while accessing to public places. 3. Gender, taking a fire department fieldtrip, participating in fire department activities and attending school fire drills provide no significant difference on cognition and skills of burning and fire prevention concepts as well as on fire prevention attitude. 4. Using the Internet to access information, participating in fire drills and operating fire extinguishers lead to a significant difference on the burning and fire prevention concepts and skills. However, The scores of the post-test are obviously higher than those of the pretest. no significant difference is found on fire prevention attitude.