影響越南股價表現因素之實證研究

An Empirical study on factors effecting stock performance in Vietnam

黃文倫(VAN-LUAN HOANG)

指導教授 ： 阮氏清萍

朝陽科技大學/管理學院/財務金融系/碩士(2013年)

摘要

無

關鍵字

無

並列摘要

Vietnam exhibits an impressive development record for the last two decades its economy has been one of the fastest growing ones in Asia, however Vietnam’s securities market is remaining tiny, high risk and preliminary form. Therefore, to master factors affecting the Vietnamese stock performance is necessary for not only investors but also CEO as well as policymakers.
This study investigates these factors with the daily and yearly data during 2007 to 2011 period. The structural break is also taken into consideration for more proper results. The empirical results show that the state and foreign capital and firm size have the positive effect on stock performance, while private capital does not exert its ability. When considering the break of foreign capital, it is found that the higher stock performance accompanied with higher risk concentrate on the group with foreign capital within 0~19.87%, and with higher foreign capital is only significant on the group with foreign capital within 19.87%~38.70%. Moreover, the interest rate is found to have the negative impact on stock return.

並列關鍵字

Ownership structure ； stock performance ； structural break ； Vietnam

參考文獻

Aivazian, V. a., Ge, Y., & Qiu, J. (2005). Can corporatization improve the performance of state-owned enterprises even without privatization? Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(5), 791–808.

Al-Khazali, O. M., & Zoubi, T. A. (2005). Empirical Testing Of Different Alternative Proxy Measures For Firm Size. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 21(3), 79–90.

Allen, F., & Gale, D. (1999). Corporate Governance and Competition.Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.

Aman, H., & Nguyen, P. (2008). Do stock prices reflect the corporate governance quality of Japanese firms? Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 22(4), 647–662.

Atje, R., & Jovanovic, B. (1993). Stocks Markets and Development. European Economic Review, 634–640.