桌燈造形特徵辨識之研究

A Study on Form Features of Identification of Table Lamp

蘇筱婷(Hsiao-Ting Su)

指導教授 ： 劉又升 ； 陳立杰

大同大學/設計學院/工業設計學系所/碩士(2008年)

摘要

程雅伶（2007）指出桌燈是現代人用以妝點家居氣氛之用，其需求程度高於其他類型；而造形設計，僅依據設計師本身的個人主觀設計意念進行設計，此種創作方式，鮮少能以系統性的數據或資料加以整理並進行分析；設計師如將這些數據在設計發想階段加以運用，進而影響使用者對於桌燈造形特徵辨識的績效，其對於產品本身將有更高的辨識度。然而，影響使用者對於桌燈的造形特徵辨識上因素繁多；因此，本研究擬以市面上桌燈的造形特徵之構件數量多寡及構件數量的比例對辨識績效進行探討。
本研究旨在探討桌燈設計，其所具備的造形設計因素對於辨識績效的影響。本研究主要架構於二個實驗。
實驗一旨在探討造形特徵構件數量與造形輪廓視覺辨識績效之研究。自變項包括呈現方式（灰階效果包含輪廓線、輪廓線）與構件數量水準（高、低），其中性別為受試者內設計因子，桌燈呈現方式、構件數量水準與風格則為受試者間設計因子。研究結果顯示，構件數量顯著影響受試者的辨識反應時間，構件數量低時，反應時間較構件數量高時快；桌燈呈現方式對於辨識反應時間是無顯著差異的，然而，構件數量則無顯著影響辨識正確率。
實驗二旨在探討造形特徵構件比例與造形輪廓視覺辨識績效之研究。自變項包括構件比例程度（一致、不一致）與構件數量（4個、5個、6個），其中性別為受試者內設計因子，構件比例程度與構件數量則為受試者間設計因子。研究結果發現，桌燈的構件比例顯著影響受試者的辨識反應時間，尤其是對於比例不一致的情況下，觀看者在辨別上所需花費的時間較構件比例不一致時較長。而在構件數量為5個時，其辨識上所花費的時間是最少的，與實驗一結果略為出入。然而，構件比例與構件數量並未對受試者的辨識正確率上有顯著影響。
本研究利用實驗法探討桌燈的構件數量與構件比例，對於觀看者而言是否有辨識上的影響，期盼藉由研究成果能夠提供從事工業設計相關專業人員主觀的審美感以外，也能在產品設計的發想階段，提供輔助參考依據。

關鍵字

辨識 ； 造形特徵 ； 構件數量 ； 構件比例 ； 認知

並列摘要

Ya-ling Cheng (2007) pointed out that modern people decorate their household with table-lamps, and their demand is greater than other types of lamps. While designers often design the form of table-lamps according to the subjective design concepts, such kind of creation can hardly be collated and analyzed with systemic data. If designers can apply these data during the development of design concepts and thereby affect the user’s efficiency in identifying the features of table-lamp styles, this will help to enhance product identification. However, as there are many factors affecting the user’s identification of the features of table-lamp styles, this study plans to investigate the identification efficiency in terms of the amount of form feature elements and proportion of element quantity of table-lamps on the market.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect on identification efficiency of the form design elements in table-lamp design with two experiments.
The aim of Experiment 1 is to investigate the visual identification efficiency of the quality of form feature elements and form contours. Independent variables included presentation (grey-scale effect include contours and contours) and element quality level (high and low), where gender is the within-subject-design factor; and table-lamp presentation, element quality level and style are the between-subject factors. Results indicate: element quality has a significant effect on the identification reaction time of participants, when the element quantity is low, the reaction time is faster than it is when the element quantity is high; the reaction time difference in table-lamp presentation is insignificant; however, element quantity has no significant effect on identification accuracy.
The aim of Experiment 2 is to investigate form feature element proportion and the visual identification efficiency of form contours. Independent variables include element proportion level (consistent and inconsistent) and element quantity (4, 5 and 6), where gender is the within-subject-design factor; and element proportion level and element quantity are the between-subject factors. Results indicate: the effect of the element proportion of table-lamp on the identification reaction time of participants is significant; particularly when the proportion is inconsistent, and viewers spend more time on table-lamps with inconsistent element proportion. Also, when there are five elements, the response time is the least, and this is different from the results obtained in Experiment 1. However, neither the element proportion nor the element quantity has a significant effect on the identification correct rate of participants.
This study investigated the identification effect on viewers of element quantity and element proportion in order to provide a supplementary reference for industrial designers to develop design concepts in addition to subjective aesthetic view.

並列關鍵字

perception ； form feature ； element quantity ； element proportion ； identification

參考文獻

13. 程雅伶（2004）。燈飾造形愉悅性之研究。大同大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。

17. Biderman, I.(1987). Recognition-by-components：A theory of human image understanding . Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.

18. Gibson, E. J.(1969). Principles of perceptual and development, Nework: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

19. Garner, W. R.(1970). The stimulus in information processing, American Psychologist, 25, 350-358.

21. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N.(1979). Brain mechanisms of vision, Scientific American, vol.82, 84-97.