透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.224.73.125
  • 學位論文

高級中等學校軍訓主管領導模式與部屬工作滿意度關聯之研究

A Study on the Relationship between the Leadership Styles of Military Training Executive and the Working Satisfaction of Subordinates in Senior High Schools

指導教授 : 蔡碩倉
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


文獻上已證明領導者的領導模式與部屬工作滿意度呈現高度相關。以國內軍訓教官而言,教官雖服務於學校,但主管與部屬之間的互動仍然保有軍隊上下主從之倫理關係,主任教官擁有之權力不亞於部隊的主管,故軍訓主管的領導模式對於部屬工作投入程度將有決定性之影響。本研究主要探討高級中等學校軍訓主管領導模式與部屬工作滿意度之關聯性,結果發現:高級中等學校軍訓主管領導模式,可歸類為擁有魅力並注重激發動機之「曹操型領導模式」、善用知識啟發之「諸葛亮型領導模式」、強調個別關懷卻缺乏知識啟發及激發動機之「劉備型領導模式」及缺乏魅力與欠缺個別關懷之「劉璋型領導模式」。其中部屬若面對「諸葛亮型領導模式」,則對於「薪資報酬滿意程度」具高度滿意;若面對「曹操型領導模式」,則對於「同事滿意程度」及「主管滿意程度」具高度滿意;若面對「劉璋型領導模式」,則對於「同事滿意程度」、「薪資報酬滿意程度」及「主管滿意程度」具高度不滿意。

並列摘要


Literature has proved that high positive correlation appears between the leadership styles of executive and job satisfaction of subordinate. Regarding the domestic situation, the military ethics remains in the interaction between executive and subordinate which is the primary and the secondary even in an educational institution. The power which a chief military instructor possesses is not second to that of a director in the army. Therefore, the leadership styles of military training executive have decisive influence on how much the subordinates are devoted to their jobs. This research probes into the relation between the leadership styles of military training executive and the job satisfaction of subordinates in senior high schools. The following will be the research findings. The leadership styles of military training executive in senior high schools include the “Caocao pattern” which keeps both fascination and inspiration, the “Zhugeliang pattern” which utilizes knowledge enlightenment , the “Liubei pattern” which emphasizes individual concern but short on knowledge enlightenment and inspiration and the “Liuzhang pattern” which is short of fascination and individual concern. Among them, higher satisfaction exists with “Caocao pattern” at colleague and executive; higher satisfaction exists with “Zhugeliang pattern” at salary; higher dissatisfaction exists with “Liuzhang pattern” at colleague, salary and executive.

參考文獻


許士軍(1993)。管理學。台北:東華書局。
許士軍(1995)。管理學。台北:東華書局。
蔡進雄(2000b)。轉型領導與互易領導對學校行政領導的啟示。學校行政,11,45-50。
張遠萍、許玲女(2000)。某教學醫院護理人員對工作滿意情形之探討。長庚護理,11(2),63-74。
廖裕月(1998)。國小校長轉化領導型式與領導效能之研究:以北部四縣市為例。未出版碩士論文,台北師範學院國民教育研究所。

被引用紀錄


孫明慧(2011)。交易領導轉型領導及工作士氣關係之研究以桃竹苗三縣市軍訓主管為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2011.00155
林麗蓉(2008)。我國軍訓督導制度實施現況與運作成效之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0204200815524907
蔣遠平(2010)。高屏區大專院校軍訓教官生涯規劃之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315202153
李志威(2010)。高中職軍訓主管領導特質與軍訓教官組織承諾關係之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0006-1507201011335100

延伸閱讀