農會信用部合併關鍵成功因素之研究

A Study on Key Success Factors for Merging Credit Department of Farmer’s Associations

陳鏋聿(Chen Man-Yu)

指導教授 ： 蔡碩倉

亞洲大學/管理學院/經營管理學系碩士班/碩士(2004年)

摘要

政府連續三波針對經營不良的農會信用部進行整併，但在欠缺相關配套措施及互信基礎下，引發基層農民群起反彈與質疑。惟解決現行農會信用部問題，不應單純由金融層面觀之，如何確切掌握農會信用部合併關鍵成功因素實屬當務之急。
本研究依購併理論將合併過程分為宣佈前置期、轉換期與凝聚期三階段，建立農會信用部合併關鍵成功因素模型，藉由專家及農會信用部之相關主管進行問卷調查，再以層級分析法歸納關鍵因素。結果顯示各階段最重要的關鍵成功因素依序為：「強化經營體質，提昇競爭力」、「人員薪資暨退休問題妥善處理」、「凝聚價值觀，培養長期合作默契」。

關鍵字

農會信用部 ； 合併 ； 關鍵成功因素 ； 層級分析法

並列摘要

Although three times of successive merger for credit department of farms'' associations, there were rebounds and doubts from the farmers resulted in the shortage of correspondent compact programs and less belief on the procedure adopted by the government. Keeping an eye on financial interface to adopt the merger of those objective credit departments is not suitable than focusing on handling the appropriate success key factors seems to be a priority issue for the public.
With regard to the merger of credit department of farms’ associations in this paper, there are preannouncement phase, transition phase and consolidation phase, three procedures of merger model adopted by theories and consolidated by building up key success factors model individually to take up questionnaire on experts and supervisors proceed by analytic hierarchy process which were considered in row that strengthening constitution to promote competition, dealing with salary, laying off and retirement rights and interests properly, and cultural mix for long term cooperation are the most important key success factors.

並列關鍵字

credit department of farms’ associations ； merger ； key success factors ； analytic hierarchy process

參考文獻

30. 黃惠敏，「我國金融機構處理不良債權機制之探究」，中原大學會計研究所碩士論文，2003，頁29-30。

20. 陳永琦，「以制度經濟學分析我國農會信用部經營問題與改進方向」，台灣財務金融季刊，2001，2（3）。

45. 顏晃平，「台灣地區農會信用部之合併與成本結構分析」，台灣大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文，2000。

28. Hofer, Charles W. and Dan Schendel, 1978, Strategy Formulation : Analytical Concepts , St. Paul：West, pp. 75-76.

2. Amit, Raphael and Joshua, Livant, 1988, “Diversification Strategic, Business Cycle and Economic Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), pp.99-110.