透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.221.165.246
  • 學位論文

應用CMMI於改善國民小學課程評鑑流程

Applying CMMI to Improve Elementary School Curriculum Evaluation Process

指導教授 : 廖岳祥
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


近年來,國民教育歷經數次的改革,不論是校內或校外總是瀰漫著正反兩極不同的論調,也由於教育政策的朝令夕改,家長在無所適從下,對於教師期待更高,希望藉由教師的專業知能撥亂反正,讓我們的國民教育步入正軌,帶領國家主人翁邁向未來。面對家長對教師的要求,教師本身的專業能力即備受考驗,為了提升教師的教學品質,實施課程評鑑已刻不容緩,故學校內部如何實施及結果的認定更考驗著行政人員與教師的智慧。 而在九年一貫課程暫行綱要公布後,課程評鑑(Curriculum Evaluation)成為課程綱要之正式文獻,但也由於課程評鑑是學校課程發展與實施過程中極弱的一環。因此,實施課程評鑑之學校大部分直接採用它校的實施方式和經驗,直接進行課程評鑑。正因所使用的課程評鑑非為個案學校量身訂做,於是在實施課程評鑑的過程當中,就產生了許多不適用和窒礙難行之處。 基於上述原因,本研究藉由能力成熟度整合模式(Capability Maturity Model Integration, CMMI)的導入,建立一套適合個案學校的課程評鑑流程,而此流程不會因行政人員或教師職位的更動而有所停滯,同時也能在評鑑流程的循環過程當中,持續不斷的改善。更藉由CMMI的導入學校課程評鑑,使得教師的參與意願增加,同時也提昇教師的教學品質及學校的競爭力。

並列摘要


In recent years, compulsory education has been experiencing successive reforms, and there are two very different views, in spite of inside or outside of school. Also, because education policies change too frequently, parents don’t know what course to take and therefore highly expect teachers to bring order out of chaos, in order to let our compulsory education follow the correct direction leading our children to head into the future. Facing parents’ requirements, teachers’ professional abilities should be tested for promoting teaching quality. And, how to carry out Curriculum Evaluation should be of great urgency, which challenges the intelligence of the administrative staff and teachers. After the Grade 1-9 Curriculum Temporary Outline announces, the Curriculum Evaluation becomes the formal document of the Outline, but it is also the very weak part of the processes of the curriculum development in the school. The reason is that most schools are directly adopting other schools’ curriculum evaluation experiences and methods, consequently, producing many incompatibilities and difficulties. According to the above mentioned, this study builds up a set of process of the Curriculum Evaluation that suits an individual case school by conducting the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI). Therefore, the Curriculum Evaluation process will not be unsettled, even if the administrative staff and teachers change frequently. Also, in the meantime, the Curriculum Evaluation process will encourage more participation from teachers, and will improve the teaching quality and the competitiveness of the school.

參考文獻


[1] 陳錦蓮,學校層級課程評鑑之課程領導與作為,國教新知,第52卷,第2期,第62-72頁,2005。
[22] 黃政傑,學校課程評鑑的概念與方法,課程與教學季刊,第6卷,第13期,第1-20頁,2003。
[34] 方德隆,學校本位課程發展的理論基礎。課程與教學季刊,第4卷,第2期,第1-24頁,2001。
[35] 方德隆,課程的理論與實務,麗文,2001。
[39] 許書斌,應用CMMI於校園單一簽入環境開發之流程改善,亞洲大學資訊工程學系碩士論文,2007。

被引用紀錄


陳志峰(2009)。應用CMMI於國民中學校務自我評鑑流程改善之研究〔碩士論文,亞洲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0118-1511201215461488

延伸閱讀