本研究旨在探討資訊融入補救教學和傳統口述補救教學兩種模式,對學生在社會學習領域成就上的差異。 研究採準實驗設計,隨機選取台中縣甲、乙二所國小五年級學童共168位為受試者。紙筆前測後,甲校五年級91位學童為實驗組,實施資訊融入補救教學,乙校五年級77位學童為對照組,實施傳統口述補救教學,補救教學後再讓168位學童施以線上後測。 針對國小五年級下學期翰林版社會科領域前、後測成績,以spss軟體之T檢定及二因子變異數統計分析方式,來評估兩種教學模式下,兩組學童在在社會學習領域成就上的異同,得到以下結果: 一、在不同教學法下,學生在社會科成就後測表現有顯著性差異。資訊融入補救教學明顯優於傳統口述補救教學。 二、相同能力水準之學生在不同教學法下,學習成就後測結果有顯著性差異。 三、相同教學法對不同能力水準之學生在社會科成就前後測進步分數上有顯著性差異。 四、不同教學法對不同能力水準之學生在社會科成就測驗進步分數差距有明顯差異。
The purpose of this study is to research the differences among students' academic achievements in Social Studies Learning Area, which are under the modes of the remedial instruction integrated with the information technology and the traditional oral one. We adopted the quasi-experiment design in this study and randomly chose 168 fifth grade students from two elementary schools in Taichung County as the experimental objects. After the written pretest, 91 students from A school were considered as the experimental group and given the remedial instruction integrated with the information technology; the other students were regarded as the control group and given the traditional oral remedial instruction. Then, they took the on-line posttest. Examing the scores of the pretest and posttest on the Social Studies published by Han-lin Bookstore with T-test and two-factor analysis of covariance in the software, SPSS, we get the results below: 1. The differences are significant under two teaching methods. The remedial instruction integrated with the information technology is obviously better than the traditional oral one. 2. Under the different teaching methods, the students of the same level have significantly different academic achievements on the posttest. 3. Using the same teaching method on the students of different levels makes the progressive grades significantly different. 4. Using the different teaching methods on the students of different levels makes the range of the progressive grades significantly different.