近年來綱路犯罪時有所聞,以綱路誹謗為例,由於綱路訊息散佈快、使用者匿名,使得個人更加自由而無所顧忌的發表言論,但是這些謠言卻有傷害商譽與誹謗之虞。本研究的研究目的在於從綱路謠言的角度切入,探計國內外綱路誹謗的案例,企圖歸納出綱路誹謗的類型及其特殊性,並就誹謗的法律面,針對因綱路不當言論而可能觸犯我國誹謗刑責的法理或法源依據,做一個深入討諭。本研究所探取的研究方法為案例分析法。除了介紹我國關於誹謗的相關法律外,并對實際發生的個案做分析與比較。以本研究所選的案例以發生在臺灣本國為主,共有五個案例,美國案例二例為輔。本研究將綱路誹謗分為個人恩怨型、醫療糾紛、破壞商譽監控疏失等類型,最後,本研究認為,對抗綱路誹謗與傷害名譽的言論,法律并非唯一的解決的途徑,善用綱路媒體的特性,并輔以法律制裁才能真正阻止綱路謠言所造成的傷害。
Crimes in cyberspace occurred from time to time. Defamation, for instance, is one of these crimes. Because of the characteristics of Internet i.e., fast and anonymous, some users make rumors freely. Sometimes rumors become defamation. The purpose of this study is to examine rumors in cyberspace and discuss seven cases Of defamation in cyberspace in Taiwan and in the U.S. We categorized defamation into four types in cyberspace: personal resentment, medical treat-disputes, commerce reputation damage, supervision negligence. In sum, the researchers concluded that law is not the only way to solve the defamation problems in cyberspace. Taking advantage of Internet and defending oneself with law maybe the best way to avoid Internet rumor damage.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。