Student Perceptions of Student Ratings of Instruction: Does School Policy Really Matter?

學生對「學生評鑑教師教學」的觀點：學校政策是否會影響呢？

張德勝(Te-Sheng Chang)

《花蓮師院學報》 14期 (2002/04) Pp. 43-65

摘要

本研究主要目的是探討學校對於「學生評鑑教師教學」的實施政策是否會影響學生對「學生評鑑教師教學」的觀點。學校政策大致分為兩種，第一種是學校全面實施，第二種是由各系所教師自行決定。研究樣本為台灣地區九所師範學院八十七學年度第二學期954位在學的學生。研究工具為研究者自編之「學生對『學生評鑑教師教學』觀點問卷」，共包含六個議題及一題整體性意見。六個議題分別為評鑑的目的、對評鑑的關注、評鑑的內容、評鑑的負面影響、評鑑的應用以及評鑑的程序。研究結果發現全面實施的學校學生和各系自行決定的學校綱生都同意學校應該實施「學生評鑑教師教學」，但是在評鑑的目的、對評的鑑關注、評鑑的內容、評鑑的負面影響、評鑑的應用等評鑑議題上，則兩種不同政策的學生，在這五個議題方面，都有部份題目達到顯著的差異。至於評鑑的程序方面，則兩種不同政策的學生，觀點都頗為一致。

關鍵字

學生評鑑教師教學 ； 大學教師評鑑 ； 學校政策

並列摘要

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of student ratings systems in college level administrative policy whereby students review instructors through an evaluation questionnaire, and the consequent student perceptions of their own ratings. There are two different policies for the student ratings systems: required policy. and optional policy. The required policy requires faculty to implement a student rating in their courses, and the optional policy offers merely optional student ratings to departments. The sample includes 954 students in teachers colleges in Taiwan, during the 1999 spring semester. The results indicate some statistically significant differences in perceptions between the two groups along with many points of agreement. The areas under consideration include the purposes, concerns, components, and negative effects of the student ratings. There is no statistical mean difference to be found in the application of student ratings across the two groups. Both groups have generally positive perceptions of the process of student ratings. Irrespective of whether the school policy mandates the evaluation or not, students agree with the following: (1) All instructors should accept the policy of conducting student ratings, (2) The current students should be the raters, (3) Faculty evaluation committees should be responsible for developing the evaluation form, (4) A department-wide evaluation form should be used for student ratings instead of a college-wide evaluation form, (5) The best time to implement student ratings is at the end of the semester, (6) The evaluation process is best conducted in the classroom, and (7) The classroom chairman should be the person to take charge of the evaluation.

並列關鍵字

Student Ratings of Instruction ； Faculty Evaluation ； Teachers College