This book review directs only to the part one of volume one of The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, edited by Nicholas Tarling. This part one includes five articles altogether. The first article is the ”Writing of Southeast Asian Studies”, authored by D. Legge, concerning with the historical development of studying about the Southeast Asian history, the change of the study proposition and explanation of history. Its discussion has little involved in the historical events, so I skip this article for reviewing. This text will put forward and comment on the other four articles in sequence. My approach of reviewing is directing to select some arguments of the articles, and given my comments on it. So, the readers can easily to find the original writers' arguments and my comments in each paragraph.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。