定向飛靶射擊選手對不同靶位射擊技術之分析

研究背景：臺灣推展定向飛靶射擊運動開始甚早，但國人對於射擊運動瞭解不多，訓練不科學化，在國際上的成績不彰，又，目前國內射擊運動所面臨的幾個問題：教練資源不足、對射擊槍枝的管制過於嚴格、射擊槍枝及耗材昂貴、企業團體贊助不熱絡、運動員的未來的升學和就業等等。目的：希望增加射擊運動人口，有效的推展射擊運動並普及化。本研究期盼能提供給國內射擊選手及教練們參考，以有效提升國內定向飛靶訓練之成效，使射擊運動日後能在國際上提升實力。方法：以定向飛靶之30名選手做為研究對象，並利用問卷對所有射擊選手的基本資料進行調查及統計分析。結果：1.國手組在各靶位的射擊成績均較非國手組為優，其中以第四靶位相差5.65分最大。命中率部分，第八靶位國手組高於非國手組達28％。2.不同年齡之定向飛靶射擊選手在各靶位射擊成績平均數正負相差均在2分以內。不同年齡的射擊選手命中率正負相差均在4％以下。3.射擊年齡9年以上與8年以下在各靶位射擊成績平均數正負相差均在1以下；射擊年齡大者在各靶位命中率均較射擊年齡小者高。4.身高171以上選手在各靶位的射擊成績均較170以下選手為優，其中第四靶位平均數相差2.63分。第二、六靶位之命中率相差11％，其餘各靶位相差在10％以下。結論：國內射擊選手在訓練時能調整射擊距離泥盤較近的位置，射擊距離愈近，預測距離（前置量）就愈短，預測距離（前置量）愈短，射擊難度就愈低，當射擊選手體會到該靶位射擊角度之預測距離（前置量）時，再逐步退至比賽射擊距離。國內射擊選手未有一套有規律而完整的訓練模式，應擬定一套射擊訓練計畫並有效落實於訓練中，以提升國內的射擊成績。身高矮者，可針對目視高度與飛行角度之問題，研擬出較適合自己的射擊模式。

關鍵字

定向射擊；射擊技術；槍枝

並列摘要

Background: Although Taiwan started early in its promotion of trap shooting sports, it has not gain a widespread popularity. Most people are unfamiliar with the sports itself. Plus the athletes were not trained with scientific methods and our standing in the international competitions has been low. In addition, the author observed the following obstacles facing today's trap shooting sports: not enough coaches, stick gun regulation, high cost on guns and supplies, lack of corporate sponsorships, and trap shooter's schooling and employment issues.Objectives: We hope training package, increase trap shooting population, and popularize trap shooting. This study aim to explore effective training techniques that can be used by the coaches and athletes to improve competition performance.Methods: We surveyed 30 trap shooters with questionnaires and compared their responses with their competition scores.Results: 1.Shooters who belongs to the national team did better than shooters who belongs to private teams, particularly the fourth trap shooting results yielded 5.65 point difference. As for shooting rates, the national team outscore the non-national team by 28% for the eight tarp. 2. For different age groups, shooting rates between the national and non-national teams average 2 points and 4% in difference. 3. Experienced shooters who have more than 9 years experience score 1 point higher than the less experience shooters on average. 4. Shooters who are taller than 171 cm also score higher than shorter shooters, particularly for the fourth trap with an average difference of 2.63, and 11% average difference for the second and sixth trap. For the rest of the traps, the average difference is below 10%.Conclusion: During the training, the shooters can adjust their position to be closer to the trap, in order to shorten the estimated distance. When the estimated distance is shorter, tt would reduce the level of difficulty in shooting the trap. Once the shooters have a good estimate of the distance to the trap, the can then step back to the shooting line. To improve our athlete's shooting performance, we need to set up a complete training plan and execute the plan. For shooters who are shorter, they need to tackle the issues of viewing angle and trap flying angle to come up with a training plan that best suite their individual need.