透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.239.123
  • 期刊

氣候變遷國際管制體系與關稅暨貿易總協定/世界貿易組織之關係:以京都機制為主要探討對象

GATT/WTO and the International Regime on Climate Change: Focusing on the Kyoto Mechanisms

摘要


氣候變遷國際管制體系係由一九九二年「聯合國氣候變化綱要公約」以及一九九七年「京都議定書」此稱國際條約爲主要的規範來源,由於氣候變遷的成因以及可能的因應措施與一國的產業以及經濟活動有密不可分的關係,因此,公約以及議定蓄所採取的管制手段,有朝向經濟管制的趨勢。雖然目前公約以及議定書並沒有明確針對相關的產品貿易行爲採取禁止或限制的現定,但烏拉圭回合談判之後,關說覺貿易總協定/世界貿易組織(以下簡稱GATT/WTO)的管制已不再限於「產品」貿易行爲,服務業的貿易、與貿易相關的投資行爲等等,也已成爲GATT/WTO所欲規範的課題,而議定書所設計的彈性履約機制,亦即所謂的「京都機制」(共同減暈、清潔發展機制、排放權交易)的運作,其間所牽涉到的經濟與貿易活動與GATT/WTO體制下之相關規範的互動,已經慢慢於國際間之引起爭辯,因此,本文將透過文獻蒐集與分析的方式,探討此一「WTO與環境」之議題連結在全球氣候變遷此一個案中的最新發展,以及其對我國可能帶來的影響。

並列摘要


The international climate change regime consists of the Framework Convention on Climate Change and the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. The causes of as well as the potential mitigation measures in responding the problem of global climate change are closely related to a country's industrial policies and economic activities. Consequently, the regular measures adopted by the Convention and the Protocol mostly concentrates economic measures. On the other spectrum, the regulation of international trade under the World Trade Organisation has, after the Uruguay Round, extended from goods to areas such as services and trade-related investment measures. The Convention and the Protocol have yet to restrict or regulate trade in related goods. However, the design and operation of the three Kyoto Mechanisms involve trade and investment activities that might come under the jurisdiction of the WTO. The interaction between the rules of the GATT/WTO and the climate change regime, thus, has been under debate sine the adoption of the Kyoto Protocol in 1997. The purpose of this Article is to present an analytical argument on this particular case-study under the broader ”WTO and the Environment” debate and to provide some policy suggestions as to the implications of this interaction on Taiwan.

參考文獻


施文真(2001)。台灣於環境保護v.s.自由貿易之國際辯論中的定位。台大法學論叢。31(1),45-74。
Trade Rules and Climate Change Policy: Some Issues of Synergy and Conflict
Birnie, P.,Boyle, A.(2002).International Law & The Environment.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Bodansky, D.M.(1995).Yale Journal of International Law.
Bodansky, D.M.(1995).Annual Review of Energy Environment.

被引用紀錄


林益萱(2014)。經貿優惠政策與WTO規範權衡—我國經貿優惠政策之兩難〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201400943
陳亮賢(2013)。國際法下環境難民之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.10284
曾燕倫(2012)。共同但差別責任原則的再建構:後京都時代全球氣候治理的革新〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.02866
林春元(2012)。超越內國行政法與國際法--氣候變遷全球行政法的演變、形貌與影響〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.01164
吳淑芬(2010)。碳稅作為溫室氣體排放管制手段之探討〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2408201001175100

延伸閱讀