透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.159.224
  • 期刊

規範競爭理論與公司證券法制的建構:兼論對台灣法制的可能啟示

Regulatory Competition in Corporate Regimes: And Some Observations on Possible Regime Changes in Taiwan

摘要


競爭的因子在立法過程中究竟扮演什麼角色?在經濟全球化的今天,許多國家為了經濟發展,紛紛修訂相關法規以吸引人才及外商的直接或間接投資。依此觀之,負責制定法律規範的政府幾與一般市場上之生產者無異,而不同政府間自然就會有規範競爭的情形產生。尤有甚者,若各國的選法規則可以完全尊重當事人選定之準據法,則將形成另一種「外帶型」的規範競爭,而這也使得政府所生產的規範產品將處於更大的競爭壓力之下。 雖然規範競爭早已是外國學界激烈討論的課題,惟在台灣,完整而深入的理論論述尚屬少見。有鑑於此,本文以公司證券法制的討論為核心,嘗試從規範競爭的觀點加以分析。本文首先解釋規範競爭理論的源起,以及如何讓競爭有效率地運作的先決條件。在這樣的基礎上,本文進一步分析整理美國公司法制與國際證券法制上的相關討論,以求完整呈現外帶型規範競爭的優劣評估。本文相信這樣的認識與探討,將可刺激台灣主管機關思考規範競爭的正面效應,並重新檢視公司證券法制上的規範政策。

並列摘要


What is the role of competition in the process of law-making? At the age of economic globalization, many countries are making regulatory efforts to compete for talents and foreign direct or indirect investment. In this view, government is little different from another producer in the overall economy, and law is the product. Regulatory competition across jurisdictional lines is therefore inevitable. In addition to the prototype, a ”portable” form of regulatory competition can be put in place provided that all conflict of laws rules allow individuals or firms to choose the applicable law among jurisdictions. Under such circumstances, regulatory products can be put under even more competitive pressure. While regulatory competition is vociferously debated in other parts of the world, theoretical discussions on this topic are rarely seen in Taiwan. This article on corporate-securities regime is an attempt to fill the vacuum. It first explains the theoretical origin of regulatory competition, and examines the prerequisites to an efficient regulatory market. Based on the systematic understanding, it further offers a thorough analysis on ”portable” regulatory competition with thorough presentation of arguments for and against the U.S. corporate charter competition and international securities regulations. Such understanding and academic inputs, this article believes, should inspire Taiwan's regulator to review its regulatory thinking and initiate some changes to reap the competitive benefits.

參考文獻


黃銘傑(2000)。公司監控與監察人制度改革論:超越「獨立董事」之迷思。臺大法學論叢。29(4),159-208。
Abramowicz, Michael(2003).Speeding up the Crawl to the Top.Yale J. on Reg..20,139.
Adler, Jonathan H.(2005).Jurisdictional Mismatch in Environmental Federalism.N.Y.U. Envtl. L. J..14,130.
Ayres, Ian(1995).Supply-Side Inefficiencies in Corporate Charter Competition: Lessons from Patents, Yachting and Bluebooks.Kan. L. Rev..43,541.
Baysinger, Barry D.,Butler Henry N.(1985).The Role of Corporate Law in the Theory of the Firm.J.L. & ECON..28,179.

被引用紀錄


賈瑋中(2010)。企業發行台灣存託憑證之研究——兼論政府放寬投資法令之影響〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201000807
施昭邑(2017)。商業組織與股東人數限制之研究-對我國閉鎖性股份有限公司法制之反思〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201700372
曾冠樟(2017)。證券交易所跨境連線交易之監理架構研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201700123
孫慧芳(2016)。從金融監理法制環境論我國金融市場競爭力〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201603434
林莆晉(2015)。論我國商事法院之設立—以新加坡國際商事法院為借鏡〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.02663

延伸閱讀