強制手段與被害人受欺瞞的同意：以強制性交猥褻罪為中心

Force Methods and Agreement under Deception: Based on the Sexual Assault Crime

王皇玉(Huang-Yu Wang)

《臺大法學論叢》 42卷2期 (2013/06) Pp. 381-432

https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2013.42.02.04

摘要

刑法第211條規定，對於他人以強暴、脅迫、恐嚇、催眠術或其他違反其意願之方法而為性交者，處三年以上十年以下有期徒刑。何謂「其他違反意願之方法」？究竟需不需要先由加害人進行一個類似於強暴、脅迫、恐嚇的「強制手段」？此外，如果被害人受到加害人的欺騙而答應進行性交行為，可否認為是違反被害人意願的強制性交罪呢？此等詐騙式性交行為，有各式類型，例如宗教詐騙性交，加害人告知被害人受惡靈附身，只有與加害人為性交行為始可消災解厄；又例如白嫖型性交，被害人受加害人欺瞞誤以為與其性交後，可以取得對價；甚或騙婚型性交，被害人受加害人欺瞞，誤以為與加害人性交後，加害人願意與之結婚等等。本文的研究重心，主要探討「其他違反被害人意願」的手段究竟有多廣泛？在研究方法上，主要藉由我國法與德國法之比較，分析兩國刑法規定之異同，最後提出本文有別於德國法的看法。

關鍵字

強制手段 ； 有瑕疵的同意 ； 違反被害人意願 ； 性侵害 ； 性騷擾 ； 高度強制手段 ； 低度強制手段

並列摘要

In compliance with the provision of Article 211 of Criminal Code, a person who by threats, violence, intimidation, inducing hypnosis, or other means against the will of a male or female and who has sexual intercourse with such person shall be sentenced to imprisonment for not less than three years but not more than ten years. What is the so-called ”other means against the will of a person”? Is the use of a ”forcible means” similar to threats, violence and intimidation by an offender the prerequisite? Moreover, if a victim agrees to have sexual intercourse with an offender because he/she is deceived by the offender into it, shall such an offense be regarded as a crime of compulsory sexual intercourse? Offenders may use various fraudulent means to deceive victims into having sexual intercourse with them. Taking religious fraud for example, offenders may tell victims that they are possessed by a demon and the only way to exorcise the demon is to have sexual intercourse with them. Offenders may also deceive victims into having sexual intercourse with them by offering a payment (in a way similar to prostitution without a payment being made). Offenders may also deceive victims into having sexual intercourse with them by promising them with marriage. The victims become willing to have sexual intercourse with offenders because they think that they will get married. The research focus of this study is on investigating how wide the range of other means ”against the will of a male or female” is. As for the research method, this study mainly compared and analyzed the laws in Taiwan with those in Germany. In the end, this study pointed out the differences between the laws in Taiwan and those in Germany.

並列關鍵字

force methods ； agreement under deception ； against the victims'will ； sexual assault crime ； sexual harassment ； high forcible means ； lowly forcible means

參考文獻

李聖傑（2010）。〈刑法第二二二條第一項第一款「二人以上共同犯之」之 適用思考〉，《政大法學評論》，115 期，頁1-54。（Sheng-Chieh Lee [2010]. A study on violent sexual offences committed by more than two perpetrators in Criminal Code Art. 222, Para. 1, Cl. 1. Chengchi Law Review, 115, 1-54.）

黃榮堅（2011）。〈2010 年刑事法發展回顧：慾望年代，慾望刑法？〉，《台 大法學論叢》，40 卷特刊，頁1795-1839。（Jung-Chien Huang [2011]. Developments in the law in 2010: Criminal law. National Taiwan University Law Journal, 40[Spe.], 1795-1839.）

鄭逸哲（2010）。〈與未滿16 歲人進行性接觸之刑法適用：評最高法院99 年度台上字第4894 號刑事判決和最高法院99 年度第7 次刑事庭會議決 議〉，《法令月刊》，61 卷12 期，頁35-48。（Yat-Che Cheng [2010]. Application of criminal law to sexual encounter with a minor under the age of sixteen: Comments on the Supreme Court 99-Tai-Shang-4894 criminal judgment and the 7th resolution of Supreme Court Criminal Division in 2008. The Law Monthly, 61[12], 35-48.）

周昕緯（2013）。《論乘機猥褻罪、強制猥褻罪與性觸摸罪之區分標準：兼 評法院判決》，台北大學法律學系研究所碩士論文（未出版），台北。 （Hsin-Wei Chou [2013]. The research of the distinguishing criteria of opportunity indecency, compulsory indecency and sexual touch crime, and the comment on the court judgment. Unpublished master’s thesis, College of Law, National Taipei University, Taiwan.）

Arzt, G. (1970). Willensmängel bei der Einwilligung. Frankfurt a. M.: Athenräum.