透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.17.150.89
  • 期刊

庫車丁谷山獻疑

Misunderstanding of the Dinggu Mountain in Kutcha

摘要


龜茲佛教史的研究,使得庫木吐喇石窟所在的丁谷山在當代研究論著中被頻繁提及。本文梳理近代西域文獻,認為由於清代西域官員和寧在《回疆通志》的編纂中誤將吐魯番盆地中的柳中當作庫車地名對待,遂把清初《西陲紀略》記錄的魯陳丁谷山也誤植在庫車庫木吐喇附近的卻勒塔格山。經過祁韻士、徐松的沿誤,特別是《西域水道記》的權威性,使得後續的研究者輕信了「庫車丁谷山」的結論。推本溯源,「丁谷山」這一漢語詞彙,只是吐魯番盆地吐峪溝的舊稱。

並列摘要


Studies on the Buddhism of Kutcha makes the Dinggu mountain where the Kumtula Grottoes is located a keyword in contemporary researches. After going through the modern materials about the Western Regions, the article points out Hening, an official served in the Western Regions of the Qing Dynasty, was the one worthy of more attention. It's Hening who mistook Liuzhong of the Turfan Basin a place of Kutcha when compiling Huijiang Tongzhi (lit. Chorography of Xinjiang), and then mistook the Dinggu mountain of Luchen in Xichui Jilue (lit. Brief History of the Western Border Area) dated the early Qing Dynasty as the mountain Qol-Tag near the Kumtula Grottoes. Such misunderstanding was persisted by Qi Yunshi and Xu Song, and the authority of Xu's famous work Xiyu Shuidao Ji (lit. River Systems of the Western Regions) makes people believe easily the Dinggu mountain was in Kutcha. To sum up, as a Chinese placename, the Dinggu mountain is actually a previous name of Toyoq in the Turfan Basin.

參考文獻


明.李賢、彭時等纂修 《大明一統志》,天順五年(1461)刻本。
清.王廷襄 《葉柝紀程》,吳豐培編《絲綢之路資料匯鈔(清代部分)》,北京:全國圖書館文獻縮微複製中心,1996 年。
清.王樹枏等纂修,朱玉麒等整理 《新疆圖志(附索引)》,上海:上海古籍出版社,2017 年。
清.和寧 《三州輯略》,北京:線裝書局,2006 年冊影印嘉慶十年(1805)序刻本。
清.和寧 《回疆通志》,臺北:文海出版社,1966 年影印民國十四年(1925)沈瑞麟校印本。

延伸閱讀


國際替代計量